Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Maybe CI:GO would work.
I can't believe that I'm saying it, but looks like Gabe knows that mean number 3
whats the point of making a 3rd game of this if it doesnt add to or change the formula in some meaningful way
l4d1 brought the concept to life l4d2 added balance changes and alternate weapons along side Si to balance versus better
yea l4d3 would just add to the story and be a source 2 port which isnt valves style if that was th case wed have half life 10 at this point
With that argument we can say the same thing about the Call of Duty franchise. It is extremely redundant.
Maybe it's part of Valves philosophy of how they view creating sequels, but it's interesting considering how many people want another left 4 dead and another half life. and yet nothing has been done.
This Is The Answer I'm Looking For, That's The Reason Why We Don't Need L4D3
It May Ruin So Many Things Too Buuut Well, A Lot Of People Don't Understand It That It Was Repeated Many Many Times
Most Likely Valve Won't Make A 3rd Game That's Their Reason To Keep Number 2 Only :V