Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
For those who've tried the patch, is the improvement major or minor?
Still seems Object Detail is the real killer, so at low it stays :D
Eh, worse GPU than a GTX 750 Ti? Getting 45fps on HIGH??? Man, I don't even get 45fps on High on my GTX 960 (pre-update)!!!
No, let me try now. At the starting area it should give me a good idea (finished the game). Looking at the village from the starting area at medium settings used to drop me to 40fps. I'll report back.
DAMNNNNNN!!!!
Like I said, before at the starting area, overlooking the village, I would hit 40fps.
On the exact same settings as before, overlooking the starting village again, I moved around and the MINIMUM framerate I am now seeing is 50fps.
Guys, on the one hand I'm happy you guys have improved performance by ~25%. Great work. I'm happy that the people who play after this can expect a better and smoother performance.
But on the other hand, I am very disappointed cause it came after I completed the game.
With all due respect, it is precisely stuff like this that makes me not want to buy games at launch (be it AAA or indie). I mean, same thing happened with The Witness and SOMA...by the time the patches came about, I had completed the game. I truly want to support indies, but I think going forward any graphically intensive indie game will have to wait unless the optimization is stellar off the bat.
Game settings:
AA on
Motion Blur off
Textures very high
Shadows medium
Detail medium
System specs:
i5 3330
GTX 960 SC 4GB
8GB VRAM
Windows 10
Test Location: Starting area, overlooking the village
Before: Lowest framerate = 40fps
After: Lowest framerate = 50fps
Performance improvement: 25%
1st run was the settings as I had them (no AA/motion blur/textures@very high/shadows@very high/object detail@low) , 2nd was with base .cfg files, 3rd was on high, 4th was on low. Everytime GPU usage maxed out, but FPS staid roughly equal.
BTW the GTX 670 isn't a worse GPU, per se, it has approx double the floating point performance :D Only chimed in to show what users with the same CPU/GPU could expect
Sorry to hear you're not seeing the improvements we were hoping you would, though...
EDIT: same issue applies to the Anti-Aliasing setting. We're investigating.