Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
It's unlikely they would upgrade this version because it would cause "video game archival" complaints as this version is indeed different from the "complete" version you get on console at the moment, some changes, like autosave, would probably not raise too much hell, but some of the other changes specific to classes, item world, and assembly would probably rub at least a couple people the wrong way.
The fact is taking a risk like that for no financial gain is not really how businesses work. They'd rather make you mad because you had to pay them more money for a relatively minor amount of work, which is a much better risk business wise, since many people will still pay and most of them probably won't even be upset by it.
And we probably won't see 1 and 2 complete happen on PC anytime soon, it would draw too much attention to the lack of a PC version of D2 and 3. So unless we're getting ports for those, they probably won't touch any of their older titles.
I mean if I was making business decisions I would probably consider waiting until the 3D engine is up to a good standard and just importing the previous games stories into it.
That way they don't have to fight and have fans annoyed with their older mechanics, or the lack of newer mechanics.