Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
It's unlikely they would upgrade this version because it would cause "video game archival" complaints as this version is indeed different from the "complete" version you get on console at the moment, some changes, like autosave, would probably not raise too much hell, but some of the other changes specific to classes, item world, and assembly would probably rub at least a couple people the wrong way.
The fact is taking a risk like that for no financial gain is not really how businesses work. They'd rather make you mad because you had to pay them more money for a relatively minor amount of work, which is a much better risk business wise, since many people will still pay and most of them probably won't even be upset by it.
And we probably won't see 1 and 2 complete happen on PC anytime soon, it would draw too much attention to the lack of a PC version of D2 and 3. So unless we're getting ports for those, they probably won't touch any of their older titles.
I mean if I was making business decisions I would probably consider waiting until the 3D engine is up to a good standard and just importing the previous games stories into it.
That way they don't have to fight and have fans annoyed with their older mechanics, or the lack of newer mechanics.