Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you liked the look and feel of the first Avatar movie, then you will likely enjoy exploring the landscapes, despite the weaknesses in the game's progression loop and story telling. Never had any technical issues running this on an RTX4080 with a sensible frame cap.
- incredibly beautiful. Literally, most of the time I've spent in the game so far is just aimlessly wandering and exploring. I absolutely loved the "exploring" missions, for example, the one where I had to get my Ikran.
- the performance is not bad, considering I'm playing under Linux with my old RTX 3070. I'm playing it on High, with FPS drops only noticeable in very saturated areas.
- the missions are quite repetitive, and the combat doesn't appeal to me and doesn't give me the desired amount of enjoyment.
The game is definitely worth 10-20$. For 60-70$, we can definitely argue.
BTW: I haven't played the Far Cry series.