安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I've seen much more successful horror games that are far worse and less interesting.
To put it in a simpler way if I see something like this for the first time, it's going to be good it'll feel unique. Though that's not the case, there's many which follow this same chapter, long run and linear format. Though Rambley takes the spotlight, he takes up too much of it and really detracts what from a horror game is supposed to be. There's not much making up for it because of the fact that it's introducing tropes and reusing a predictable formula.
After Poppy Playtime I just kinda got tired of it.
In all honesty I think FNAF, BATIM, Poppy Playtime, Amanda and the Adventurer, and Indigo Park are the main big mascot horror games that are actually good.
At worst Indigo Park is mid. I just get tired of the repetitiveness of mascot horror.