Lumino City

Lumino City

Count Dracula 2014 年 12 月 12 日 上午 5:17
how to solve the circuit board in moving city?
why should i put a code the way in the guide?
why?
and potato as well...
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 15 条留言
Cairn.L 2014 年 12 月 12 日 上午 8:22 
The answer is Equivalent.

And what potato?
Ah, the potatoes puzzle at The Captain level.
I thought the hints already written on the note?
http://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=354949099
最后由 Cairn.L 编辑于; 2014 年 12 月 12 日 上午 8:36
Count Dracula 2014 年 12 月 12 日 上午 11:04 
alright i understand the potatoes things
but what is equivalent?
http://cloud-4.steampowered.com/ugc/537382658184438627/42666CDD0D1628680A83989EFC729CFB9CF81032/
paterns which are connected by cord aren't same each other i think...
最后由 Count Dracula 编辑于; 2014 年 12 月 12 日 上午 11:12
Count Dracula 2014 年 12 月 12 日 下午 12:35 
I found a hint for this puzzle but im still lost
the handy book?? says

"The number represented by the symbol at one end of each wire will correspond to the number represented by the symbol at theother end of that wire"
how do i know what number symbol means?
Cairn.L 2014 年 12 月 12 日 下午 5:25 
Equivalent = same in value.

引用自 Cairn.L
For instance;
A triangles plus a half triangle = 1½
A hexagons plus a half hexagon = 1½
Thus, 1½ = 1½

A semicircle minus another semicircle are equal to zero.
Thus, it connects to the empty board without any symbol on it. Zero = nothing = empty

(symbol) are equal to 6 (number).
Why? Because the shape has six(6) sides.

You can solve the rest following this matter.
The puzzle might not make sense to you at first, but try look closer.
Count Dracula 2014 年 12 月 13 日 上午 5:39 
Thank you buddy
羅仲 2015 年 1 月 21 日 上午 8:33 
I still confuse on this puzzle. Why ↓ 2 equal to a dot, not equal to ↑1 ↓3?
Cairn.L 2015 年 1 月 27 日 上午 2:18 
↓ 2 can be connected to either ↑1 ↓3 or
But if ↓ 2 connected to ↑1 ↓3, then ▌▌▌▌÷ ▌▌got nothing connected to.
potaco 2015 年 1 月 28 日 下午 8:35 
引用自 Cairn.L
↓ 2 can be connected to either ↑1 ↓3 or
But if ↓ 2 connected to ↑1 ↓3, then ▌▌▌▌÷ ▌▌got nothing connected to.
I feel like that specific match was very poorly designed (possibly even a mistake) and made this the only puzzle I had to look up the solution to.

Connecting ↓ 2 to ↑1 ↓3 makes perfect logical sense.

Connecting ↑1 ↓3 to ▌▌▌▌÷ ▌▌ makes "OK" sense... but what makes it any more logical than connecting ↓ 2 to ▌▌▌▌÷ ▌▌? It is because each section is made up of 2 parts?

Connecting ↓ 2 to only makes sense if you take that into account... The 2 is meaningless and only relates to the single dot in terms of being a single number.
Cairn.L 2015 年 1 月 29 日 上午 7:58 
As I said ↓ 2 can be connected to both, they're perfect match.
Btw, you know why ↓ 2 = ●, rite?
rattkin 2015 年 7 月 24 日 上午 6:10 
I don't? This was the only part that I couldn't really explain mathematically. Why the 2 and dot? Is that limes and infinity, something like that?
最后由 rattkin 编辑于; 2015 年 7 月 24 日 上午 6:19
eriknastesjo 2016 年 1 月 14 日 上午 6:32 
Don´t get 2 and dot either. Also, why 7 and 6? And square and "sun-three dots"?
Soultaker 2016 年 8 月 28 日 上午 6:22 
It took me way too long to figure this out, but:
↓x = "1 less than x"
↑x = "1 more than x"

So ↓2 = 1, and ↓3 = ↑1 = 2.

One dot = 1.
▌▌▌▌÷ ▌▌ = 4x ÷ 2x = 2.
trini_bwoi 2017 年 1 月 1 日 下午 2:23 
So ⅂ matches up with 6 because ⅂ has 6 sides...but hexagon+pentagon = triangle+triangle because that actually is 1½ = 1½ and we're not counting sides anymore......buuuut square = 7triangles-3circles because we're actually counting the sides of the square but not the sides of the triangles.

This puzzle is a certified mess
neizod 2017 年 1 月 12 日 上午 2:59 
引用自 Soultaker
It took me way too long to figure this out, but:
↓x = "1 less than x"
↑x = "1 more than x"

So ↓2 = 1, and ↓3 = ↑1 = 2.

One dot = 1.
▌▌▌▌÷ ▌▌ = 4x ÷ 2x = 2.

explain everything!
超強牛 2020 年 8 月 27 日 下午 11:56 
wth is the logic here?

1. ◖=½, ◖◖◖-●=½??? but according to the logic isn't it 3-1=2??
2. ▮▮▮▮/▮▮=2, "↑1↓3" doesn't it means 2+2=4?? or +1-3=-2?? what's this logic??
3. ⅂ = 6 . how the hell this equals 6?? I though we were talking about equivalent
4. ■ = ▴▴▴▴▴▴▴-●●●, so r we counting the amount of sides?
5. ●●●*▼=◖◗●●●●●●●●. in what world can you calculate like this? wheres the equivalent law of yours??
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 15 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2014 年 12 月 12 日 上午 5:17
回复数: 15