Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With Roads to Power, you can literally play the a wanderer.
As it allows you to play unlanded and just be an adventurer. CK 2 doesn't feature this and doesn't compare to CK 3 in general.
The ck 2 version simply doesn't have what Ck 3 has. Many of the reasons is because CK 2 literally doesn't have the ability to add what Ck 3 can. Since it doesn't fully utilize Jomini, and had a very archaic scripting.
OP, i recommend to look online and you will see reviews. Here will only be rose tinted glasses, which can mislead new players.
Ck 3 is far more advance and simply has more capabilities then ck 2.
Ck 2 as a game simply can't do as much functionally. The GOT devs on 3 have REALLY made something great. Ck2's mod was a good start, Ck 3 just brought it to a new level.
(which CK 2 lacks the functionality to even do what you can in ck 3's mod.)