That's not how anything works, and if it does, NOBODY would know about this game.

daktrgonzo 님이 먼저 게시:

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

If you need to qualify it with "for an indie game," you're already admitting that it isn't selling well.

It's an indie game because it was made by independent developers. That's what an "indie" means.

Being an indie game isn't like a GPU - you don't magically get extra money by turning on DLSS.

Mansa Mustard 님이 먼저 게시:

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

If you need to qualify it with "for an indie game," you're already admitting that it isn't selling well.

What, because only AAA-level sales count as 'selling well'?

The amount of mental gymnastics for this drama-mongering is truly astounding.

Not at all.

Most indie games sell less than a thousand copies.

That means 1,001 copies is "selling well for an indie game." At the same time, we should be able to agree that selling 1,001 copies of a game isn't "selling well" by any unqualified definition of the phrase.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0iTFAVeKgU

Just look as this grifter garbage posted just 2 hours ago. If you look at the replies, that's the same ppl posting here right now, this is the same gg loser involved with the dude behing that god awful show. They're the same ppl.

Yes, this is no more than just a coordinated hate campaing against the devs.

Dosto 님이 먼저 게시:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0iTFAVeKgU

Just look as this harrasment garbage posted just 2 hours ago. If you look at the replies, that's te same ppl posting here right now, this is the same loser involved with the dude behing that god awful show.

Yes, this is no more than just a coordinated hate campaing against the devs.

ITP: news articles are literal harassment.

Oh, and it's spelled "harassment," btw.

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

Dosto 님이 먼저 게시:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0iTFAVeKgU

Just look as this harrasment garbage posted just 2 hours ago. If you look at the replies, that's te same ppl posting here right now, this is the same loser involved with the dude behing that god awful show.

Yes, this is no more than just a coordinated hate campaing against the devs.

ITP: news articles are literal harassment.

Oh, and it's spelled "harassment," btw.

You're from the same wave of trolls that came from those GG grifters, i'd not surprissed if you're posting on his video right now. You ppl don't fooling anyone.

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

daktrgonzo 님이 먼저 게시:

It's an indie game because it was made by independent developers. That's what an "indie" means.

Being an indie game isn't like a GPU - you don't magically get extra money by turning on DLSS.

Do these arguments sound logical at least in your head?

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

That's not how anything works, and if it does, NOBODY would know about this game.

I think a large issue that people are over looking, is selaco isn't the only game in its genre. Like even if it's the best boomer shooter ever made. It's still 1 of hundreds if not thousands. I'm still interested in it, but I really don't need it. There's many other games like it. Some of which I already own. I only hope they can pull a no man's sky on their reputation.

daktrgonzo 님이 먼저 게시:

I fully support Devs not wanting to be associated with any organisation without giving their permission. Especially organisations that have a very toxic orbiters.

You don't even own the game.

pizza_funk 님이 먼저 게시:

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

That's not how anything works, and if it does, NOBODY would know about this game.

I think a large issue that people are over looking, is selaco isn't the only game in its genre. Like even if it's the best boomer shooter ever made. It's still 1 of hundreds if not thousands. I'm still interested in it, but I really don't need it. There's many other games like it. Some of which I already own. I only hope they can pull a no man's sky on their reputation.

Well NMS was unfinished and Shawn said stuff that wasnt true. Sony Probably forced him to do so.
But this? This a different story.

daktrgonzo 님이 먼저 게시:

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

Being an indie game isn't like a GPU - you don't magically get extra money by turning on DLSS.

Do these arguments sound logical at least in your head?

Either you think that being an indie game means it gets to play with fake money (like the fake frames from DLSS), or you don't understand your own argument.

Read the rest of the thread, where I explain in detail that, considering how poorly the vast majority of indie games sell, "selling well for an indie" doesn't actually mean anything.

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

Mansa Mustard 님이 먼저 게시:

What, because only AAA-level sales count as 'selling well'?

The amount of mental gymnastics for this drama-mongering is truly astounding.

Not at all.

Most indie games sell less than a thousand copies.

That means 1,001 copies is "selling well for an indie game." At the same time, we should be able to agree that selling 1,001 copies of a game isn't "selling well" by any unqualified definition of the phrase.

Let's hear it from you then, how many copies has Selaco sold to date?

Bouncy Boner Forest 님이 먼저 게시:

pizza_funk 님이 먼저 게시:

I think a large issue that people are over looking, is selaco isn't the only game in its genre. Like even if it's the best boomer shooter ever made. It's still 1 of hundreds if not thousands. I'm still interested in it, but I really don't need it. There's many other games like it. Some of which I already own. I only hope they can pull a no man's sky on their reputation.

Well NMS was unfinished and Shawn said stuff that wasnt true. Sony Probably forced him to do so.
But this? This a different story.

That's fair

Mansa Mustard 님이 먼저 게시:

AR | jedidethfreak 님이 먼저 게시:

Not at all.

Most indie games sell less than a thousand copies.

That means 1,001 copies is "selling well for an indie game." At the same time, we should be able to agree that selling 1,001 copies of a game isn't "selling well" by any unqualified definition of the phrase.

Let's hear it from you then, how many copies has Selaco sold to date?

Ask OP - he's the one who brought it up.

Verdi 님이 먼저 게시:

daktrgonzo 님이 먼저 게시:

I fully support Devs not wanting to be associated with any organisation without giving their permission. Especially organisations that have a very toxic orbiters.

You don't even own the game.

How do you know I don't own it through some other means? Perhaps differnt store front, or a Patreon supporter edition?

Owning or not owning the game on Steam means nothing. But you know what, I'll wishlist it and get it here at some later point too.