Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's like going to a KFC, and getting mad they don't have pizza.
It's like going 100 in a 25, and getting mad at the cop for writing you a ticket.
It's like calling a girl fat and ugly, and getting mad when she kicks you in the nuts.
Makes no sense.
Usually all of the above is just code for "I am not able to deal with invaders and can't be arsed to adapt", which, you know, is not an issue, just like any other reason to dislike invasions is completely fine.
Sadly, most of them are not upfront for some reason.
you are forced into the invasion multiplayer by summoning since that's the condition of playing multiplayer
compared to the previous titles, Elden Ring is the only one with truly opt-in invasions for singleplayer
no being invaded while solo, which is how most people play these games afaik, whereas in Dark Souls you would often get invaded solo unless you did specific things to prevent invasions, and it usually came at a penalty like less max health or less flasks
elden ring/dark souls just isn't structured well for traditional multiplayer, which makes sense as they're primarily single player games with multiplayer on the side
the unique multiplayer works well in the context of singleplayer but falls apart when talking about multiplayer exclusively