Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For example. in his stardew valley review, he seemed fairly negative, saying he wasn't sure if he'd recommend the game, but then at the end of the year, it was in his top 5. Too many of his reviews are vague and open to interpretation. I think it's better to just stick to recommending games that he clearly liked.
(Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays, everybody!)
And it's true what you say: he rarely dismisses games outright and his focus on a game's faults - while certainly being his schtik - is done in the hope of providing useful, hard-but-fair criticism.
Also happy holidays to you.
...but it would more likely than not be inadvisable to proceed with "not recommended" items, especially when representing the views of another person.
Now that said, I can certainly see merit in doing so... but it's rather complicated and there's rarely a time that I think he'll have found a game SO BAD that it would actually be worth ENTIRELY recommending against. Even then, that might not be something he wants associated with his image.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La-qxB3HnaM
@0:28 : "As much as I hate to confirm the widespread and unfounded notion that I only use ZP (Zero Punctuation) to hate on games; it was partly because I love Undertale that I never ZP'ed it. Doing so just felt... what's the word... ungrateful. Like criticizing your partner's oral-"
...although he may have been being facetious there, but I don't think anything he says isn't without at least some truthfulness to how he feels and what he believes.
(Also, I have no idea where the long response that I supposedly wrote and referred to in my previous response is now.)