Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
But I'm not sure how much work it would require, if it would cause desync on load (I've already set a MP-compatible seed for randomization, but it's not tested), or if SeelingCat even want (and have the time) to have a look.
(and BTW that's exactly why I've was always complaining about the lack of road map or simple communication of what's to come from Firaxis)
From nearly the moment I started playing Civ6, I have primarily played multiplayer with friends, always all random civs, and man are we tired of having several of the same leaders (Pedro, Eleanor, Tomyris, Dido, and a couple of others) show up in game after game. We each have all of the new content (enabled), yet we never seem to get the new civs.
Every so often, I look for a way to limit which leaders are available for Random selection, and I've seen quite a number of people wishing it were possible over the past couple of years. I just assumed it wasn't; but with the wonder picker now being a thing, the code to mirror that with random leaders seems like it is already mostly pre-written.
Much more than being able to select wonders, players have been wanting to limit which leaders are randomly assigned. Seems like the same amount of coding, for a much more useful version of the same feature. It makes me wonder which fora/social media platforms actually get attention from the devs.