we have enough taunt kills, plus i dont think valve would make a non-stock taunt a taunt kill

but if it was it would be a horrible one that no one will use, and it will probs be used around friendlys possibly killing them by mistake... it could be a cool idea but it won't be added

引用自 Sunny Side Up：

but if it was it would be a horrible one that no one will use, and it will probs be used around friendys possibly killing them by mistake... it could be a cool idea but it won't be added

Well honestly if there was a taunt kill it wouldn't be used around friendlies that often and if it was it wouldn't really matter I mean, being a friendly is fine but you are gonna get killed by a lot of people.

引用自 bloxor44：

we have enough taunt kills, plus i dont think valve would make a non-stock taunt a taunt kill

True, there are no non-weapon based taunt kills in the game so you have a point but I don't think there are that many taunt kills nor are they really used at all. Though I guess having players not using taunt kills every five seconds is a good thing.

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

引用自 Sunny Side Up：

but if it was it would be a horrible one that no one will use, and it will probs be used around friendys possibly killing them by mistake... it could be a cool idea but it won't be added

Well honestly if there was a taunt kill it wouldn't be used around friendlies that often and if it was it wouldn't really matter I mean, being a friendly is fine but you are gonna get killed by a lot of people.

引用自 bloxor44：

we have enough taunt kills, plus i dont think valve would make a non-stock taunt a taunt kill

True, there are no non-weapon based taunt kills in the game so you have a point but I don't think there are that many taunt kills nor are they really used at all. Though I guess having players not using taunt kills every five seconds is a good thing.

Actually the Rock Paper Scissors Taunt is techniaclly a taunt kill because (If opposite teams do it) the loser actually dies by the currently held weapon of the winner. So valve making it a taunt kill wouldnt be impossible. Maybe just unlikely

引用自 Eevee (Bored)：

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

Well honestly if there was a taunt kill it wouldn't be used around friendlies that often and if it was it wouldn't really matter I mean, being a friendly is fine but you are gonna get killed by a lot of people.


True, there are no non-weapon based taunt kills in the game so you have a point but I don't think there are that many taunt kills nor are they really used at all. Though I guess having players not using taunt kills every five seconds is a good thing.

Actually the Rock Paper Scissors Taunt is techniaclly a taunt kill because (If opposite teams do it) the loser actually dies by the currently held weapon of the winner. So valve making it a taunt kill wouldnt be impossible. Maybe just unlikely

Oh yeah I forgot about the existance of rock, paper, scissors.
Nice catch man

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

引用自 Sunny Side Up：

but if it was it would be a horrible one that no one will use, and it will probs be used around friendys possibly killing them by mistake... it could be a cool idea but it won't be added

Well honestly if there was a taunt kill it wouldn't be used around friendlies that often and if it was it wouldn't really matter I mean, being a friendly is fine but you are gonna get killed by a lot of people.

引用自 bloxor44：

we have enough taunt kills, plus i dont think valve would make a non-stock taunt a taunt kill

True, there are no non-weapon based taunt kills in the game so you have a point but I don't think there are that many taunt kills nor are they really used at all. Though I guess having players not using taunt kills every five seconds is a good thing.

but also is it fair to have a taunt that has an advantage to people who dont want to buy stuff, making it a Pay 2 Play Kill Taunt

引用自 -=SMT=- Chroon：

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

Well honestly if there was a taunt kill it wouldn't be used around friendlies that often and if it was it wouldn't really matter I mean, being a friendly is fine but you are gonna get killed by a lot of people.


True, there are no non-weapon based taunt kills in the game so you have a point but I don't think there are that many taunt kills nor are they really used at all. Though I guess having players not using taunt kills every five seconds is a good thing.

but also is it fair to have a taunt that has an advantage to people who dont want to buy stuff, making it a Pay 2 Play Kill Taunt

Yes, TF2 isn't that heavily pay 2 play but the majority of multiplayer free tp play games have quite a lot of microtransactions..
Besides having a taunt kill doesn't really give you that much of an advantage over other players in the first place as you won't usually actually succeed with one anyway.
(Unless you magically know when the enemy is coming around a corner)

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

In the clip we see the engineer pointing in a direction and hear the robo-dog growl/bark.
This could be made so the dog could kill/attack enemies.
tell me what you think.

If valve adds a taunt that you have to pay for, or have to have some money to get, that has a taunt kill in it, isn't that pay2win? It doesn't matter how much it works well or it works really bad, it's still exclusive to only people who pay for it. This is a horrible idea. Sorry, but it's true.'


Edit: Yes I realized someone already said this, but I just wanted to point out something.
The rock paper scissors taunt acts if you lose, you die, and if you win, the other person dies. So then it's equal. This taunt doesn't function right for it to do that, and also I dont think the creator wants to put more work just to make it killable.

引用自 Flurryvon chrastmus：

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

In the clip we see the engineer pointing in a direction and hear the robo-dog growl/bark.
This could be made so the dog could kill/attack enemies.
tell me what you think.

If valve adds a taunt that you have to pay for, or have to have some money to get, that has a taunt kill in it, isn't that pay2win? It doesn't matter how much it works well or it works really bad, it's still exclusive to only people who pay for it. This is a horrible idea. Sorry, but it's true.

I can't see how it's pay to win, taunt kills are very rarely used in game to begin with











♥♥♥♥ it this was a horrible idea just forget it.

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

引用自 Flurryvon chrastmus：

If valve adds a taunt that you have to pay for, or have to have some money to get, that has a taunt kill in it, isn't that pay2win? It doesn't matter how much it works well or it works really bad, it's still exclusive to only people who pay for it. This is a horrible idea. Sorry, but it's true.

I can't see how it's pay to win, taunt kills are very rarely used in game to begin with











♥♥♥♥ it this was a horrible idea just forget it.

Then delete the discussion

引用自 Flurryvon chrastmus：

引用自 Atomic_Beverage：

I can't see how it's pay to win, taunt kills are very rarely used in game to begin with











♥♥♥♥ it this was a horrible idea just forget it.

Then delete the discussion :spycon:

I cant :D