I Wani Hug that Gator!

I Wani Hug that Gator!

Movie Night With Mia
Dude_84_Dude  [developer] 10 Aug @ 10:29pm
2
4
Rambling about Mia and Olivia
So it's been more than a year since I began modding and writing overly long analyses of IWHTG, and I still find new things to mull over when thinking about both this game and Snoot Game, and how they compare. I'm probably no better than Anakin Skywalker doing his doctoral thesis on Darth Plagueis The Wise studies, but whatever; I like rambling about these games. And I like dissecting what I believe they do right and wrong.

***Disclaimer***Take all this with a grain of salt. This is just me being opinionated.

There's a reason most people tend to prefer E3 to E4 of Wani (at least from what I've seen). And I don't believe it's just because it feels more believable, what with it being a bittersweet ending and not an overly happy one.

Thematically, E3 represents the completion of Inco's character arc which begins with Coach Solly rebuking him for showing off and then wanting to give up. By the time of the Formal, Inco has gone from a beta caving to peer pressure to a sigma who isn't concerned with what other people think, or of needing to show off at the Formal.

And Olivia herself experiences bitter failure, the one thing she was continually being shielded from and which was stymieing her growth. It all comes together quite nicely, I think, and is a more down to Earth way to round out both their character progressions (or even lack thereof as they are both still flawed and mutually dependent). For a game whose themes are discovering personal agency and learning not to take things at face value, the climax is like a bucket of cold water, but one you anticipate.

E4, on the other hand, just doesn't do justice to the game's themes (originally worded this harshly). Across all endings, Olivia is shielded from consequence for how she initially abused Inco with her subterfuge during the art contest, thus robbing him of his own agency. This flies in the face of what is supposed to be the crux of her own character arc which is "taking back the reins of her own life." Part of taking back control of your life means facing the consequences, not just feeling really, really sorry for what you've done.

Other than the karmic twist in which she finds herself being exploited by Mia, not once does she face the consequences for her actions, other than a limp-wristed lecture by Inco. Not even Iadakan, who is supposed to be tough on her, rebukes her. Him smashing the paintings is supposed to be him shattering her worldview, but in reality it's more of a get-out-of-jail free card considering he throws Mia under the bus to achieve this. Not to mention he makes it clear he values other people's artistic contributions less than hers. He may as well be subconsciously planting the idea in her head to be even more of a self-centered narcissist, which is what she becomes in E2. Inco is yet more fodder.

The whole "Let her fail" conceit is what I have a problem with, as it's not about "failure" but just facing the consequences of her actions--which she never does. Olivia is a very passive actor in this game, especially compared to Fang who is pro-active enough to go looking for a venue for her band. I suppose that's just because the band dynamic in Snoot Game was far more kinetic for story telling. Whereas in Wani it's like the writers were struggling to find something for these characters to do, which is why the story progresses laterally at one point into some episodic fluff while the main plot is put on hold.

Point is, Olivia just doesn't do much of anything, despite being the center of the plot. And Inco ends up giving more to her than she gives back. Their relationship just feels weak compared to Anon and Fang. And it keeps bugging the hell out of me for whatever reason, and I've been struggling not just with trying to create stories that correct this imbalance, but also articulate the foundational problem.

Which brings me to Mia. Compared to Trish, she's a very weak antagonist. I don't necessarily mind one dimensional baddies as long as they serve as an adequate obstacle for the heroes. But Cavemanon set the bar pretty high with Snoot Game. While I don't believe that game is a masterpiece of storytelling, I do think it is a very competently told story, and Trish is a large part of why it works so well. She's a driving force in the plot, as well as a mirror for both Anon and Fang, and a villain you love to hate.

Mia, on the other hand, is just a stock standard bully, and is treated like a throwaway plot device for the chapter where Inco confronts her and Olivia. And even though her relationship with Ben is supposed to mirror the darker aspects of Inco and Olivia's (something I do think is fascinating in its own right), neither character receives enough development. Worse still is that Ben's redemption is lazily achieved in E4. He doesn't work for it; it's just handed to him. And arguably, he made Mia what she is. In E1 of both Snoot and Wani, both protagonists inadvertently bring out the worst in their girlfriends. Handing Ben a W, however small, for his weakness towards Mia may as well be like giving E1 Anon/Inco some pseudo happy ending after everything they've done. It makes me hate E4.

From what I've gathered from this game's development, Cavemanon made Mia what she is to spite her creator, DeadAssSpider. And while I can appreciate them wanting to get back at DAS, making Mia into a repository of hate only damaged the story and ruined her potential. Not to mention, DAS tired to make Mia into a Mary Sue, but Cavemanon themselves ended making Olivia herself into a partial Mary Sue. She's depicted as being talented beyond her years, unlike Fang who isn't described as talented but just hard working. Olivia wins an art contest in her freshman year, and even though it was due in part to Ben's article, Inco's description makes it clear from a narrative standpoint that her artistic skill is nigh peerless for her age group.

This is further reinforced by Iadakan fawning over Olivia after the Art Contest Blues chapter and describing how a mere teenage girl made him think differently about things--a point he highlights with his quill pen while gassing up Olivia's ego even further. He's the parable about how telling someone "good job" just sets them up for failure by instilling them with overconfidence.

Point is, it comes across as a lame double-standard by Cavemanon to punch down Mia while punching up Olivia. Do you know what would've worked better? If the painting she made in the ninth grade that won was objectively bad. Then she would've had a more legitimate reason to doubt her skill. Then Inco, who should've had more flaws to round him out, could've brazenly called her work mediocre without knowing it was the crippled girl who made it. Then he could've felt bad for it, started patronizing her while acting big headed. And then that could've been her motivating factor for switching his piece with her own to get even in a tit-for-tat moment.

That was a huge missed opportunity, and would've made Olivia more sympathetic. As it is, you can't sympathize with her without feeling like a hypocrite, since the point of the game is that unearned sympathy is what's damaging her. Therefore, I've felt compelled to hold her in contempt and believe she didn't receive proper comeuppance. I refuse to take this game at face value.

And I'm hoping that this mod, Movie Nights With Mia (when it's finished), will fix this problem far better than my first mod in that attempt. At the very least, Mia has a legitimate justification for feeling resentful of Iadakan. And this can serve as a bridge for Inco to get away from being defined by his relationship with Olivia and Iadakan, which I believe is holding him back. :incosad:
Last edited by Dude_84_Dude; 11 Aug @ 5:37pm
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Shatinex 10 Aug @ 10:48pm 
All that I can say is. . . Just keep cooking bro, I will wait until this mod is finish
slumbeer 17 Aug @ 12:02pm 
2
Let me start by saying that I really like your ending analysis, particularly your takes on ending 3 which is my favorite ending. I didn’t play all of your mods but I played through Movie Night With Mia and I (Don't) Wani Forgive That Gator. The analyses were a very insightful read, and they even made me want to replay the game to catch some of the details that I missed. However, there are some parts of your critique that I really disagree with.

To be specific, I think you make some wrong or at least extremely uncharitable conclusions about the characters is E4 and E2. For example, you say that in E4 Olivia doesn't deserve what she gets, I disagree.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Part of taking back control of your life means facing the consequences, not just feeling really, really sorry for what you've done.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Other than the karmic twist in which she finds herself being exploited by Mia, not once does she face the consequences for her actions, other than a limp-wristed lecture by Inco.

Olivia doesn't immediately take responsibility for the swapped painting, however, she does pay for hiding it. Although Olivia faces no formal consequences for the swap, she gets punished in a worse way than any school or arts magazine could have done. She gets blackmailed by Mia and works hard enough that she injures her hand.

Something that people often overlook is that Olivia shields Inco from the consequences of the swap and tries to keep him from getting involved with Mia. Instead of letting other people pick up the slack like she is used to doing, she tries to solve it herself for once. Olivia doesn't make Inco part of it, it’s Inco who inserts himself back into the situation. I think that is a very important point.

This is where she takes accountability, but she fails to do it alone. And when it gets hard, she shuts herself off from the rest of the world, a recurrent theme throughout the game. Her refusal to accept help with art is in principle, but I think it’s something she feels similarly about in general out of aversion to accepting help. This is where I think the critique comes from, because Olivia doesn't solve anything on her own she’s not taking full responsibility, but I would argue that this strengthens the themes of the game. Because her arc is not just about taking responsibility but also about facing her self-defeating stance about accepting help too.

If Inco hadn't intervened, she would have kept going through the last semester like this, suffering and growing bitter about it. By keeping Inco from harm, she took responsibility but that isn’t enough because that's not her only problem, and her solution ultimately hurts her. Instead of closing herself off, the silent shut-in accepts help and learns how to trust someone who has earned it. This is the struggle she overcomes, and that is her victory.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Not even Iadakan, who is supposed to be tough on her, rebukes her. Him smashing the paintings is supposed to be him shattering her worldview, but in reality it's more of a get-out-of-jail free card considering he throws Mia under the bus to achieve this. Not to mention he makes it clear he values other people's artistic contributions less than hers. He may as well be subconsciously planting the idea in her head to be even more of a self-centered narcissist, which is what she becomes in E2. Inco is yet more fodder.

I think Iadakan was fairly careful with her to not push her too hard. Because he was so lenient, he ends up doing something drastic at the end. He is willing to do anything to change the course of his student’s future, even something morally bad. It’s not justified, but it’s human. He destroys the art of former students, and he doesn't care who gets blamed. Iadakan shows that he doesn't actually care about art pieces themselves as much as he cares about the craft and people behind the process. That is why smashing them isn’t a big deal to him, because he believes that nobody will care. In his defense, he doesn't do that much more damage than Mia had already done.

I don’t see how he values Olivia’s art more than the others, he smashed her best paintings too. It’s a selfless act because in that moment he cares more about her than himself.

He destroyed the painting to get rid of the anchor around her leg that’s been keeping her down. What she does afterwards is up to her, but he gave her a chance. He destroyed the paintings so that she can go into the future without baggage. As much as he did it for her, he also did it for himself, a last attempt to do something that mattered to him, to help his student.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Mia, on the other hand, is just a stock standard bully, and is treated like a throwaway plot device for the chapter where Inco confronts her and Olivia. And even though her relationship with Ben is supposed to mirror the darker aspects of Inco and Olivia's (something I do think is fascinating in its own right), neither character receives enough development. Worse still is that Ben's redemption is lazily achieved in E4. He doesn't work for it; it's just handed to him. And arguably, he made Mia what she is. In E1 of both Snoot and Wani, both protagonists inadvertently bring out the worst in their girlfriends. Handing Ben a W, however small, for his weakness towards Mia may as well be like giving E1 Anon/Inco some pseudo happy ending after everything they've done. It makes me hate E4.

I don’t like how Ben is handled either, but I think Mia is the bigger problem. Throughout the game Ben is very manipulative and almost as bad as Mia, but we’re supposed to just accept that he’s a changed man. It’s hard to believe that Ben didn’t have a hand in what Mia did over the game. He is probably the reason why Mia knows about the painting swap in the first place, and if he told her, he told her on purpose. However, we see Ben trying to make amends in multiple endings, such as in E3 and E4, so I don’t know why you think Ben didn’t earn at least a little bit of a win. In E3 he tries to help Olivia the best way he knows, and in E4 he tries to make up for his past by telling Mia to back off from revealing the painting swap in the Scaler scene, which is also the reason why Mia lashes back.

I think Ben’s redemption would work better if Mia got one too, because it would highlight his flaws more.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
This is further reinforced by Iadakan fawning over Olivia after the Art Contest Blues chapter and describing how a mere teenage girl made him think differently about things--a point he highlights with his quill pen while gassing up Olivia's ego even further.

I think you're being uncharitable here. It’s life advice that Iadakan had forgotten and that a teenager made him remember. It also gives Inco insight into why Iadakan and Olivia are so close.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Point is, it comes across as a lame double-standard by Cavemanon to punch down Mia while punching up Olivia. Do you know what would've worked better? If the painting she made in the ninth grade that won was objectively bad. Then she would've had a more legitimate reason to doubt her skill. Then Inco, who should've had more flaws to round him out, could've brazenly called her work mediocre without knowing it was the crippled girl who made it. Then he could've felt bad for it, started patronizing her while acting big headed. And then that could've been her motivating factor for switching his piece with her own to get even in a tit-for-tat moment.

It would have been interesting to see her struggle with getting better at art as part of the process, but the whole story would have to be rewritten around it.

Moving on from E4, I also think it’s worth discussing E2 and how you interpret it in your mod Movie Night With Mia. In it you take a very Inco slanted view, but I don’t think it’s fully warranted for E2 Inco.

By portraying Inco as the victim, I think you lose some of the complexity that makes E2 so good. In E2 both Olivia and Inco are at fault for what happens at the formal. I don't think Inco deserves that much pity for what happened, because Inco is constantly lying to Olivia and himself. Inco can’t get better by just moving on from Olivia to Mia. Olivia isn’t keeping Inco back, it’s Inco that’s keeping Inco back. Jumping ship to Mia is just going to be E2 epilogue all over again, but with Mia.

He rarely expresses his real thoughts or feelings, instead he says whatever he thinks Olivia will like. This dishonesty by omission is a part of every interaction they have. Inco enables Olivia’s worst tendencies just so that he can be with her. He doesn't think about anything other than himself or how to make Olivia like him. After Olivia's tantrum, he isn't concerned about what she said at the formal, he only cares about how it's going to make him look. Caring about yourself isn't wrong, but he egged her on to give the speech without actually being interested. Inco didn't care what she was going to say, he mindlessly puffed her up because that's what he thinks he is supposed to do. When it went bad, he showed what he really only cares about himself. Inco isn't blameless for what happened, and Olivia is right to be mad at him for that.

Connecting this to Movie Night With Mia, Inco and Mia are in the wrong and need to accept some kind of responsibility, but by the end both are deflecting blame onto others. It's easy to sympathize with Inco since he wasn't being malicious, but pointing fingers at everyone else makes him unlikable because he put himself into this situation.

Even though I like Mia in your mod and I think you make some good points, it's a little rich that all the critique of the rest of the characters is coming from her, considering what she did to Olivia.

At one point Inco admits that Iadakan destroyed the display case, and he tries to justify himself instead of defending Iadakan or explaining why it happened. This came across to me like a betrayal of Iadakan, making Inco unlikable. You make several points about how Mia is justified for disliking Iadakan, but that doesn't negate what Iadakan was to Inco and Olivia. And that Mia did something a lot worse to Inco and Olivia.

All of these points highlight my problem with a Mia romance in general. What Mia does in the story is so reprehensible, that any justification just comes off as simping. I think there is potential here with Mia, just not as a romance story.
Last edited by slumbeer; 17 Aug @ 12:14pm
Dude_84_Dude  [developer] 17 Aug @ 6:45pm 
@Slumbeer
I want to address all of these point by point but can't for now. Need to keep my head clear while I'm on the homestretch for finishing the mod. Ending 2 of 4 is done and 3 of 4 is most of the way done. Also have to finish rewriting most of the first chapter after Sebek convinced me to rework it. And then that will require rewriting parts of the story to fit with it. I'm hoping to have all that done within the next week. Then all that'll be left is asset creation.
Dude_84_Dude  [developer] 29 Aug @ 7:39pm 
To whoever gave Slumbeer a jester emoji, piss off. I invite open criticism and disagreement, and I even thought they made good points I do want to address at some point. This is not an echo chamber. I don't need sycophants who blindly agree with me. Crap like that just reflects badly on us all.

If anyone thinks I am wrong or missing the mark, please don't hesitate to let me know. Though for now, this is the mindset I want to keep for the narrative I'm nearly done with, for better or worse.
Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
To whoever gave Slumbeer a jester emoji, piss off. I invite open criticism and disagreement, and I even thought they made good points I do want to address at some point. This is not an echo chamber. I don't need sycophants who blindly agree with me. Crap like that just reflects badly on us all.

If anyone thinks I am wrong or missing the mark, please don't hesitate to let me know. Though for now, this is the mindset I want to keep for the narrative I'm nearly done with, for better or worse.

Mate take a breather. Its a random emoji thing on like a month old comment I gander the fella who left that is long since gone by this point. And 1 random emoji ain't gonna sink the entire Wani community.

Being the internet their is always gonna be at least one guy like that who is just unproductive or trolling. And having a major blowout just feeds those kinda types and attracts more usually just best to ignore em and carry on.
Dude_84_Dude  [developer] 2 Oct @ 11:26am 
Originally posted by slumbeer:
Olivia doesn't immediately take responsibility for the swapped painting, however, she does pay for hiding it. Although Olivia faces no formal consequences for the swap, she gets punished in a worse way than any school or arts magazine could have done. She gets blackmailed by Mia and works hard enough that she injures her hand.

Eh, I don't see how that's worse than her name being tarnished should her misdeeds come to light. Injuries heal. And the fact is, Mia is characterized as an irredeemable bully who eventually gets her comeuppance, thus canceling out any karmic retribution Olivia receives. Maybe if it was a permanent injury then it would have more significance.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
Something that people often overlook is that Olivia shields Inco from the consequences of the swap and tries to keep him from getting involved with Mia. Instead of letting other people pick up the slack like she is used to doing, she tries to solve it herself for once. Olivia doesn't make Inco part of it, it’s Inco who inserts himself back into the situation. I think that is a very important point.

No, she repeats the same mistake as before which is purposefully keeping him in the dark and then hoping the problem fixes itself. I do agree that Inco taking the initiative and getting involved of his own volition is an important point in his development, and is one of the few instances where he directly impacts the story rather than being a passive actor. That doesn't change the fact Olivia herself is still being irresponsible and not respecting Inco enough to tell him of impending danger, which is a theme with her. She's short-sighted and doesn't think ahead, always wanting instant gratification.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
This is where she takes accountability, but she fails to do it alone. And when it gets hard, she shuts herself off from the rest of the world, a recurrent theme throughout the game. Her refusal to accept help with art is in principle, but I think it’s something she feels similarly about in general out of aversion to accepting help. This is where I think the critique comes from, because Olivia doesn't solve anything on her own she’s not taking full responsibility, but I would argue that this strengthens the themes of the game. Because her arc is not just about taking responsibility but also about facing her self-defeating stance about accepting help too.

That's a good point and it's certainly in keeping with the themes of the game. My biggest gripe is that Iadakan is aware this is all happening and was most likely aware of her initial subterfuge and he just stands by and does nothing, which kinda of reinforces Olivia's own attitude. I know the idea is that he's hoping she'll come forward on her own to take responsibility but in both instances she acts too late, and he's just willing to let Inco take the brunt of her inaction, which makes him look negligent towards one of his charges. That he never scolds Olivia for abusing Inco's trust after he vouched for him is annoying.

As someone on Reddit pointed out, "Iadakans willingness to essentially burn anyone to help Olivia goes under criticized he was really willing to let an active artist have his reputation be forever tarnished on the haopes she could forward about replacing Inco's submission has always kind of agistate md with how easygoing Inco is about it."

Inco always has to come to her rescue and receive practically no net benefit for it, other than having a moody chick with BPD be his girlfriend.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
If Inco hadn't intervened, she would have kept going through the last semester like this, suffering and growing bitter about it. By keeping Inco from harm, she took responsibility but that isn’t enough because that's not her only problem, and her solution ultimately hurts her. Instead of closing herself off, the silent shut-in accepts help and learns how to trust someone who has earned it. This is the struggle she overcomes, and that is her victory.

But again, she never faces any repercussions that aren't of her own making. In either case, she's still shielded from responsibility and never faces any lasting impacts since it's all brushed under the rug. If anything, it only feeds into her growing over-reliance on Inco which we see in E2. Iadakan practically sets them both up for this outcome which can only be avoided if Inco goes the extra mile in asserting himself. Which apparently has the effect of altering her personality so she actually respects him and doesn't just view him as a means to an ends.



Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Not even Iadakan, who is supposed to be tough on her, rebukes her. Him smashing the paintings is supposed to be him shattering her worldview, but in reality it's more of a get-out-of-jail free card considering he throws Mia under the bus to achieve this. Not to mention he makes it clear he values other people's artistic contributions less than hers. He may as well be subconsciously planting the idea in her head to be even more of a self-centered narcissist, which is what she becomes in E2. Inco is yet more fodder.

Originally posted by slumber:
I think Iadakan was fairly careful with her to not push her too hard. Because he was so lenient, he ends up doing something drastic at the end. He is willing to do anything to change the course of his student’s future, even something morally bad. It’s not justified, but it’s human. He destroys the art of former students, and he doesn't care who gets blamed. Iadakan shows that he doesn't actually care about art pieces themselves as much as he cares about the craft and people behind the process. That is why smashing them isn’t a big deal to him, because he believes that nobody will care. In his defense, he doesn't do that much more damage than Mia had already done.

I get that Iadakan is flawed and I think that's why he's a well-written character with a three dimensional personality. But his flippant attitude towards other people's works is, if anything, like a signal to Olivia that they're less important than she. Which happens in E2 when she leans on Inco who puts his own artistic pursuits on hold for her. And that could've been the case for all those whose art he destroyed. Maybe they wanted to continue pursuing but couldn't because life got in the way. Olivia continually has tunnel vision with regard to art being her only out. She tells Inco "there's no other baskets" during the rain scene, and this is pretty much Iadakan reinforcing that whether he knows it not.

Not to mention, but destroying both painting, he's not only covering for Olivia but himself who was aware of it. It just makes them both look self-serving. Inco, again, gets nothing out of this. He's a witness to it all and is along for the ride. A sensible person might've washed their hands of it all and walked away from them both.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
I don’t see how he values Olivia’s art more than the others, he smashed her best paintings too. It’s a selfless act because in that moment he cares more about her than himself.

He smashed her paintings knowing she could always make more because he's knows there's more to art than just mere material. He saw they were holding her back and was freeing her from bondage.

That's the narrative crux of the action, at least. But in his mind, he already had nothing to lose. He even says something sardonic like "what are they going to do, fire me?" And it's still piling more onto Mia, who you could say "deserved it," but it's still him throwing someone else under the bus. And Inco is just going along for the ride with no say in it. The game even makes of point of saying Iadakan ignores him when Inco initially protests what Iadakan is doing. For a story about Inco developing his own agency, his own needs are often placed on hold for Olivia who is the more flawed of the two.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
He destroyed the painting to get rid of the anchor around her leg that’s been keeping her down. What she does afterwards is up to her, but he gave her a chance. He destroyed the paintings so that she can go into the future without baggage. As much as he did it for her, he also did it for himself, a last attempt to do something that mattered to him, to help his student.

Again, the problem is he let it get that bad due to his own initial inaction. If Inco had gone to Principal Scaler--which he really should have--Olivia and Iadakan both would've been forced to deal with their own crap. But everything conveniently aligns to Olivia not only faces lesser consequences but her coming out ahead of it is presented as her character growth, and not just her being allowed to cheat fate at Inco's expense.

She is Inco's anchor.

In E2, he let's her drag him down. In E3, he's strong enough to carry them both. In E4, they're both strong enough to work in tandem, but she still gets to avoid taking responsibility. It's Inco he has to clean up her mess in Scaler's office and outsmart Ben so he doesn't end up getting punished alongside Mia when he did NOTHING wrong. Then he has a moment where he turns to Ben and tells him it's all his fault from the beginning because of the article he wrote for her. But that flies in the face of Inco's earlier correct proclamation to Olivia that's she responsible for all her own problems if you make all the right choice in the Art Contest Blues chapter.

It all comes back to Inco himself starting as collateral in some ongoing war. He's a victim of fate in a lot of way. And while I think that makes him interesting, I don't like that Olivia essentially gets to get away with it. He's perpetually at the bottom of a triad composed of himself, Olivia, and Iadakan, with Ben in orbit.
Dude_84_Dude  [developer] 2 Oct @ 11:27am 
Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Mia, on the other hand, is just a stock standard bully, and is treated like a throwaway plot device for the chapter where Inco confronts her and Olivia. And even though her relationship with Ben is supposed to mirror the darker aspects of Inco and Olivia's (something I do think is fascinating in its own right), neither character receives enough development. Worse still is that Ben's redemption is lazily achieved in E4. He doesn't work for it; it's just handed to him. And arguably, he made Mia what she is. In E1 of both Snoot and Wani, both protagonists inadvertently bring out the worst in their girlfriends. Handing Ben a W, however small, for his weakness towards Mia may as well be like giving E1 Anon/Inco some pseudo happy ending after everything they've done. It makes me hate E4.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
I don’t like how Ben is handled either, but I think Mia is the bigger problem. Throughout the game Ben is very manipulative and almost as bad as Mia, but we’re supposed to just accept that he’s a changed man. It’s hard to believe that Ben didn’t have a hand in what Mia did over the game. He is probably the reason why Mia knows about the painting swap in the first place, and if he told her, he told her on purpose. However, we see Ben trying to make amends in multiple endings, such as in E3 and E4, so I don’t know why you think Ben didn’t earn at least a little bit of a win. In E3 he tries to help Olivia the best way he knows, and in E4 he tries to make up for his past by telling Mia to back off from revealing the painting swap in the Scaler scene, which is also the reason why Mia lashes back.

I think Ben’s redemption would work better if Mia got one too, because it would highlight his flaws more.

Agreed. His redemption in E4 is half-assed, and I even want to say he's responsible for Mia getting to the point she reaches.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
This is further reinforced by Iadakan fawning over Olivia after the Art Contest Blues chapter and describing how a mere teenage girl made him think differently about things--a point he highlights with his quill pen while gassing up Olivia's ego even further.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
I think you're being uncharitable here. It’s life advice that Iadakan had forgotten and that a teenager made him remember. It also gives Inco insight into why Iadakan and Olivia are so close.

But again, Inco is just on the sidelines having to deal with the crap Olivia puts him through which Iadakan never rebukes her for. It's an unequal relationship. His art is just collateral.

Originally posted by Dude_84_Dude:
Point is, it comes across as a lame double-standard by Cavemanon to punch down Mia while punching up Olivia. Do you know what would've worked better? If the painting she made in the ninth grade that won was objectively bad. Then she would've had a more legitimate reason to doubt her skill. Then Inco, who should've had more flaws to round him out, could've brazenly called her work mediocre without knowing it was the crippled girl who made it. Then he could've felt bad for it, started patronizing her while acting big headed. And then that could've been her motivating factor for switching his piece with her own to get even in a tit-for-tat moment.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
It would have been interesting to see her struggle with getting better at art as part of the process, but the whole story would have to be rewritten around it.

Moving on from E4, I also think it’s worth discussing E2 and how you interpret it in your mod Movie Night With Mia. In it you take a very Inco slanted view, but I don’t think it’s fully warranted for E2 Inco.

By portraying Inco as the victim, I think you lose some of the complexity that makes E2 so good. In E2 both Olivia and Inco are at fault for what happens at the formal. I don't think Inco deserves that much pity for what happened, because Inco is constantly lying to Olivia and himself. Inco can’t get better by just moving on from Olivia to Mia. Olivia isn’t keeping Inco back, it’s Inco that’s keeping Inco back. Jumping ship to Mia is just going to be E2 epilogue all over again, but with Mia.

Oh, I don't deny E2 Inco is very flawed. I've made no secret that I don't like him because of how annoying and weak he is. That doesn't make him any less of a victim though. He's just letting himself be victimized because we live in a society that's never not telling men and boys to "do better" and "be kind" by people who have no intention of reciprocating. He makes his own bed with Olivia.

With our mod, Inco has a chance at finally attaining personal agency, but he can't gain it without first severing his ties with Olivia. The worst Inco does in E2 is act with hubris while reinforcing Olivia's bad behavior without knowing it. She's still responsible for own selfish attitude.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
He rarely expresses his real thoughts or feelings, instead he says whatever he thinks Olivia will like. This dishonesty by omission is a part of every interaction they have. Inco enables Olivia’s worst tendencies just so that he can be with her. He doesn't think about anything other than himself or how to make Olivia like him. After Olivia's tantrum, he isn't concerned about what she said at the formal, he only cares about how it's going to make him look. Caring about yourself isn't wrong, but he egged her on to give the speech without actually being interested. Inco didn't care what she was going to say, he mindlessly puffed her up because that's what he thinks he is supposed to do. When it went bad, he showed what he really only cares about himself. Inco isn't blameless for what happened, and Olivia is right to be mad at him for that.

I address all this in the first chapter of the Mia mod. Again, I'm not saying he's without fault. And even if he egged her on, she still made the choice to act that way herself. She's still responsible for her own behavior. This seems to be something people in this community forget. The game's narrative crux is that Olivia has to take responsibility for herself. She's not Inco's puppet. She's hears what she wants to hear from him. Hell, I even have Mia tell Inco flat out to his face that he puffed up her ego more or less. But Olivia still chooses to be how she is.

I ".. In fact, I was disappointed and even angry she did."

Mia "Well I mean why wouldn't she? She was the center of your attention—and Iadakan's too if what you're saying is right."

I "Yeah...she was the center of my attention. So why?"

Mia "Look, I'm gonna tell you a harsh truth as a chick myself: no woman respects a man who makes her the center of his world."

I "..."

Originally posted by slumbeer:
Connecting this to Movie Night With Mia, Inco and Mia are in the wrong and need to accept some kind of responsibility, but by the end both are deflecting blame onto others. It's easy to sympathize with Inco since he wasn't being malicious, but pointing fingers at everyone else makes him unlikable because he put himself into this situation.

Yes, both are deflecting blame. That's part of their mutual character flaws. Mia says it herself that people always project their flaws onto others, but that's what she herself is doing through her spiel. I explore all this in the Mia mod, and its four ending reflect that. (at least I hope).

Originally posted by slumbber:
Even though I like Mia in your mod and I think you make some good points, it's a little rich that all the critique of the rest of the characters is coming from her, considering what she did to Olivia.

During the part of E1 where she and 1nco are dancing, Mia has a lot of interesting insights about Olivia. From a technical standpoint, she is being what's called an external narrator, where instead of the narrator telling the reader vital points of interest in the plot, a character is expositing the most important parts. I believe that's what Cavemanon were doing with Mia on a mechanical level. But I take it to mean that Mia is a very streetwise person who knows how to read people. That would certainly be in keeping with her sociopathy. And the whole point of her cynical observations on people and the world is that it takes one with the disease to recognize the symptoms.

She and Olivia are more alike than either would like to admit.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
At one point Inco admits that Iadakan destroyed the display case, and he tries to justify himself instead of defending Iadakan or explaining why it happened. This came across to me like a betrayal of Iadakan, making Inco unlikable. You make several points about how Mia is justified for disliking Iadakan, but that doesn't negate what Iadakan was to Inco and Olivia. And that Mia did something a lot worse to Inco and Olivia.

Why wouldn't E2 Inco betray Iadakan? Considering his state of mind and also that he's feeling betrayed himself, having put so much effort into Olivia only to get shoved aside. Besides, Mia is intimidating him into telling her what she wants to hear.

Originally posted by slumbeer:
All of these points highlight my problem with a Mia romance in general. What Mia does in the story is so reprehensible, that any justification just comes off as simping. I think there is potential here with Mia, just not as a romance story.

Well, Inco has a chance to simp for Mia and reinforce her own behavior the way Ben did. I made this for fun because I always wondered about a Mia x Inco story, as have many others. It was just a question of find a good common denominator for them, and that's Solly, who I think had the potential to be a better mentor figure than Iadakan (or even Ferris for that matter).

Writing and programming is complete and the endings are all ready to go. It's just a matter of Sebek finishing up the assets. I'll be interested in hearing your thoughts on the mod a month from now.

To say one final thing in closing, some people think I don't like Inco but that's not true. While it's true I don't like him as much as Anon, I think in some ways he's a better (or has the potential to be a better) protagonist because he doesn't spout esoteric 4chan humor(I like Anon's edgy jokes though) and is a more relatable fish out of water archetype. I feel bad for him if anything because he's often treated like a joke by the community, condemned to act the part of the bumbling nitwit paired with a more intelligent wife/girlfriend like it were some formulaic sitcom.

I've ended up resenting Olivia for this and wishing to see Inco treated with more respect. She's an annoying brat. I think Anon and Fang are a better couple on the whole. Inco and Olivia are too one-sided.
Last edited by Dude_84_Dude; 2 Oct @ 11:52am
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Per page: 1530 50