can you do an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for example USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)

Yeah I've noticed many of the creators redirect us to stuff if we suggest it and I had that happen with a suggestion of a Hydrofoil Torpedo Boat, a LCVP Suggestion, and kinda ignored the Landing Ship suggestion which are things that would come in really handy. Also, we need something like the B-55 Crusader / Reporter.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Mallorcagps:

can you do an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for example USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)

No.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Oh no look who:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Mallorcagps:

can you do an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for example USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53)

No.

How about a true battleship rather than the NQAF's existing Hood?
Or a flying command centre?

Oprindeligt skrevet af The Emerald Men Official:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Oh no look who:

No.

How about a true battleship rather than the NQAF's existing Hood?
Or a flying command centre?

we aren't going to build a battleship.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Oh no look who:

Oprindeligt skrevet af The Emerald Men Official:

How about a true battleship rather than the NQAF's existing Hood?
Or a flying command centre?

we aren't going to build a battleship.

Battleships Are WAY Too Large, I suggest you ask different builders for Vintage Vehicles.

Oprindeligt skrevet af dannytheburritoman:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Oh no look who:

we aren't going to build a battleship.

Battleships Are WAY Too Large, I suggest you ask different builders for Vintage Vehicles.

Correct, we strive for assets that can be atleast playable at Low Physics (Preferably High) whilst also having the bare minimum interior spaces that are highly detailed to make a creation feel real.

A Battleship can't achieve any of that, since it wouldn't be playable at Low Physics even without an interior.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Oh no look who:

Oprindeligt skrevet af dannytheburritoman:

Battleships Are WAY Too Large, I suggest you ask different builders for Vintage Vehicles.

Correct, we strive for assets that can be atleast playable at Low Physics (Preferably High) whilst also having the bare minimum interior spaces that are highly detailed to make a creation feel real.

A Battleship can't achieve any of that, since it wouldn't be playable at Low Physics even without an interior.

That is the exact problem, while one sounds like an amazing idea, games, unlike reality, have lag, and it can end your gameplay because it is so laggy. Also, with the new update, if something no-clips through walls it can crash your game. My Avro Shackleton model had multiple problems relevant to no-clipping and crashed my game repetatively.

Massive Explosions also can end your game quickly too. Which all the ammo detonating would delete your computer.

A CIWS anti air gun

Oprindeligt skrevet af Hepps:

A CIWS anti air gun

More like the beaver how about.

A carrier based variable wing heavy fighter like the F-14 or a fighter-bomber like the F-111 could be interesting. Additionally, some form of radiation weapon/dirty bomb could be pretty cool, if a bit finnicky with how fuel rods are

Oprindeligt skrevet af dannytheburritoman:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Hepps:

A CIWS anti air gun

More like the beaver how about.

would still be cool as ♥♥♥♥

Oprindeligt skrevet af Hepps:

Oprindeligt skrevet af dannytheburritoman:

More like the beaver how about.

would still be cool as ♥♥♥♥

Yes

A coast guard S&R sea plane which can be used to pick up downed pilots or sailors. Maybe it could look like a catalina flying boator grumman g111 albatross??