安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As an added bonus, maybe there could even be an option to name blocks based on their position. "Front/Left Thruster", for example.
However, I'd just have a secondary checkbox, "zero-pad numbers", rather than a selector for number of digits. If someone had, say, 200 thrusters, I don't really see why *anyone* would want to number those 01-99, then 100-200, rather than just 001-200. So if the numbers are zero-padded at all, they should be padded based on the count of modules selected (this is also how Whip's renaming script works). Frankly, it's also easier from a user perspective, since you don't have to go check how many you have and think about how many digits that needs to be (though, to be fair, the answer is very rarely more than 3 digits).
On the plus side, you can do batch jobs, make a bunch of different rename groups and then execute the script to handle all of them. But it's not quite as simple as selecting the blocks, typing in the new name, and hitting "rename".