Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1. Emmanuel Lead's - "Victor Emmanuel must stay on the throne, he is the soldier king etc etc" this might give a boost to war support but also and 'acceptance of fascist diplomacy +85' which means it is still possible to side with the fascists but changes their imperial focus from African to European (so instead of going after Greece, securing the suez etc there is a more direct route to Austrian, French and Swiss claims like the first world war. Perhaps culminating on the claims on Turkey)
2. Umberto Leads - "A change in King is needed for the new world, yada yada". It was no secret however that Umberto was not a charming guy so perhaps he could get a similar effect to Edward the 8th 'inexperienced imperialist'. He would be the opposite to Victor Emmanuel in that he would add stability and 'acceptance of democratic diplomacy +85. This would of course be the much less interesting route.
Think of the choice between Militarism and Shoa constitution for the new Japanese focus tree.