安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
And only if you do, in fact, use lithium batteries. Which is far superior to lead-acid, NiCD, or classic NiMH*.
* = Newer NiMH using polyacene anodes may have 2x the density of LFP, but has relatively poor speed of charge/discharge, but ~2x-5x the cyclic life! Properly cared for, even old NiMH can outlast lipo, but LFP usurped the battery market until recently.
Point is, solar panels mostly use silicon, copper, and aluminium and are HIGHLY recycleable, covering Mono and Polycrystalline panels. Flexible amorphous and thin-film use different materials and involve rare earth materials, such as Indium and Gallium, and are NOT recycleable in addition to having half the life expectancy, producing more heavy, and having between 1/2 and 1/3 the efficiency of mono and poly panels.