Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bulgaria)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraina)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Anyways this is either unrealistically contrived or a bug.
Almost solved with 4 MC4000X + DX300 (one for input one for output)
MC 4000X all connected to single wire moved between 2 DX300
every has unified code:
```
nop
nop
nop
mov x0 acc
tgt acc 0
+ mov acc x0
+ mov acc x0
+ mov acc x0
slp 1
```
nops - balances input
multiples movs - try to push value to required DX300
it ALMOST working )) - in my case just 5 points of verification was fail. Sad, but challenge to do it not with xors fails )))
- the first one has inA and inB as input, normal output
- top one, inA and 1st xor output as input, normal output to output B
- top one, inB and 1st xor output as input, normal output to output A