Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin









Anyways this is either unrealistically contrived or a bug.
Almost solved with 4 MC4000X + DX300 (one for input one for output)
MC 4000X all connected to single wire moved between 2 DX300
every has unified code:
```
nop
nop
nop
mov x0 acc
tgt acc 0
+ mov acc x0
+ mov acc x0
+ mov acc x0
slp 1
```
nops - balances input
multiples movs - try to push value to required DX300
it ALMOST working )) - in my case just 5 points of verification was fail. Sad, but challenge to do it not with xors fails )))
- the first one has inA and inB as input, normal output
- top one, inA and 1st xor output as input, normal output to output B
- top one, inB and 1st xor output as input, normal output to output A