安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
@Monkey Magic, if you'd like to handle compatibility differently, just let me know.
Given that you have a flak helmet though, I have added those missing values in an update just now. In keeping with it's theme, I have set these values as what I believe should be appropriate.
Comparing normal quality flak fibreglass, and steel helmets, the values appear as:
FIBREGLASS ( STEEL)
Sharp - 42% (63%)
Blunt - 42% (31.5%)
Heat - 14% (42%)
Insulation (cold) - 0.6c (0.5)
Basically fibreglass is mostly weaker than steel, except where blunt impact is concerned (due to it's flexibility) but suffers where heat is concerned. Still better than wood (for example, plate armour) though