安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As for feedback: The Warhammer novel Knight-Errant features Bretonnia going on a campaign against the beastmen, and at the third (i think) battle the Duke in charge of the army asks the knights-errant to give their mounts to the more senior knights as a lot of steeds were lost in the previous battles. The knights-errant are then asked to bolster the depleted infantry (peasant) ranks. They do so (very reluctantly) and fight with sword and shield.
I think bretonnia could really use dismounted sword/shield wielding knights-errant unit rather than a unit that is a upgraded foot squire unit in both function and visuals. And as the novels indicate, knights-errants are more likely to be asked to fight on foot than the KotR.