Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
As for feedback: The Warhammer novel Knight-Errant features Bretonnia going on a campaign against the beastmen, and at the third (i think) battle the Duke in charge of the army asks the knights-errant to give their mounts to the more senior knights as a lot of steeds were lost in the previous battles. The knights-errant are then asked to bolster the depleted infantry (peasant) ranks. They do so (very reluctantly) and fight with sword and shield.
I think bretonnia could really use dismounted sword/shield wielding knights-errant unit rather than a unit that is a upgraded foot squire unit in both function and visuals. And as the novels indicate, knights-errants are more likely to be asked to fight on foot than the KotR.