Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
[string "script\campaign\mod\apply_supply_lines_bundles.lua"]:318: attempt to call method 'force_type' (a nil value)
Imm playing as norsca and i have an army thats assisting an ally nation, but it's currently at 60% additional upkeep while in raiding encamy.
I had an idea for a feature suggestion: Have proximity to outposts in allied territories lower the upkeep of an army. It would add a stategic element to outpost placement, and also allow excursions into allied territories which should indeed improve the supply lines.
Let me know what you think! Thanks!
I checked a fresh campaign just to be sure, and all behaviors are as above - by default, new armies increase supply lines unless I exempt the faction. I suppose a work-around might be to exempt all factions from supply lines in campaign_features_tables, but perhaps there's some reason that this method wasn't chosen in the first place (future-proofing, maybe?).
Currently putting together a new modlist for a session and this bit is a pain to check for, especially since the games logfiles are of zero help when trying to narrow down a culprit and testing permutations/bisect requires several people to jump through hoops.
I saw there's a 2nd component to this mod, but it looks like it's already been integrated into this one.