Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
[string "script\campaign\mod\apply_supply_lines_bundles.lua"]:318: attempt to call method 'force_type' (a nil value)
Imm playing as norsca and i have an army thats assisting an ally nation, but it's currently at 60% additional upkeep while in raiding encamy.
I had an idea for a feature suggestion: Have proximity to outposts in allied territories lower the upkeep of an army. It would add a stategic element to outpost placement, and also allow excursions into allied territories which should indeed improve the supply lines.
Let me know what you think! Thanks!
I checked a fresh campaign just to be sure, and all behaviors are as above - by default, new armies increase supply lines unless I exempt the faction. I suppose a work-around might be to exempt all factions from supply lines in campaign_features_tables, but perhaps there's some reason that this method wasn't chosen in the first place (future-proofing, maybe?).
Currently putting together a new modlist for a session and this bit is a pain to check for, especially since the games logfiles are of zero help when trying to narrow down a culprit and testing permutations/bisect requires several people to jump through hoops.
I saw there's a 2nd component to this mod, but it looks like it's already been integrated into this one.