Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
[string "script\campaign\mod\apply_supply_lines_bundles.lua"]:318: attempt to call method 'force_type' (a nil value)
Imm playing as norsca and i have an army thats assisting an ally nation, but it's currently at 60% additional upkeep while in raiding encamy.
I had an idea for a feature suggestion: Have proximity to outposts in allied territories lower the upkeep of an army. It would add a stategic element to outpost placement, and also allow excursions into allied territories which should indeed improve the supply lines.
Let me know what you think! Thanks!
I checked a fresh campaign just to be sure, and all behaviors are as above - by default, new armies increase supply lines unless I exempt the faction. I suppose a work-around might be to exempt all factions from supply lines in campaign_features_tables, but perhaps there's some reason that this method wasn't chosen in the first place (future-proofing, maybe?).
Currently putting together a new modlist for a session and this bit is a pain to check for, especially since the games logfiles are of zero help when trying to narrow down a culprit and testing permutations/bisect requires several people to jump through hoops.
I saw there's a 2nd component to this mod, but it looks like it's already been integrated into this one.