安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I wold like to recreate various mechanisms, like those examples: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhoXNQqrCmEfAaTf0AfQ1Ztxmz2DoZiCk
More than once, I was having a need to create some form of "slider" like in this example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUGOtdwxvYI&list=PLhoXNQqrCmEfAaTf0AfQ1Ztxmz2DoZiCk&index=52
Trying those with regular 1x diametar size and necessary wider hollow gap in 2x2 size become too impractical for using in game. 0.5 diametar timber placed between gap made just 1x block size should do a trick.
In some ship designs I need to add weight balance to make ship stable, sailboats for not tiping over and steamboats need even more to fight with countertorque generated by engine and propeller. If you put weight on bottomest part of ship it is much more effective and you need to use less weight for same result. Less balance weight - better performace and less energy loss.
As for 0.5 timbers, I need those for various parts of mechanisms, mostly to be used with 1x1 catch blocks. So far, I have used 0.5 pulleys, but you need a lot of dem, and over longer axes, you can't properly attach them on both catch blocks. Being smaller in diameter helps a lot to prevent creating closed loop by accident and causing crashing game to desktop.
Also, to create 0.5 round timber model, would it be possible just by editing *.SMB file ?