Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
My first (successful) attempt clocks in at 480G / 4292C / 1895A but cheats a bit by discarding the reagents into an infinite chain after reading them.
@garr890354839 Think about if there's something you can do that behaves differently depending on whether there's an atom present or not.
Then I improved it to make a tighter gif 570/4553/418 https://i.imgur.com/cU61fwL.gifv
Then I figured I could save money by ditching the obliterator and going with an infinite tail.
I saved 40g but paid for it with a huge increase in area (and huge decrease in frame rate)
530/4553/1309
One question though, how do you get the product requirement and the reagent to be that large? The editor only allows up to a width of 9, right?
Genuine. [cdn.discordapp.com]
Cheating [cdn.discordapp.com]