Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
My first (successful) attempt clocks in at 480G / 4292C / 1895A but cheats a bit by discarding the reagents into an infinite chain after reading them.
@garr890354839 Think about if there's something you can do that behaves differently depending on whether there's an atom present or not.
Then I improved it to make a tighter gif 570/4553/418 https://i.imgur.com/cU61fwL.gifv
Then I figured I could save money by ditching the obliterator and going with an infinite tail.
I saved 40g but paid for it with a huge increase in area (and huge decrease in frame rate)
530/4553/1309
One question though, how do you get the product requirement and the reagent to be that large? The editor only allows up to a width of 9, right?
Genuine. [cdn.discordapp.com]
Cheating [cdn.discordapp.com]
I think this helped me really undestand what a Turing-Complete mechanism is.