安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I'll have to agree with Quickdraw's sentiment, at least partially.
People are unwilling to nerf themselves, but not because they're "better" than everybody else, but because it's not fun to lose an encounter because you've got a handicap.
Good players are good because of natural skill, not because they play all the time.
I've got 720 hours played, and I'm still mediocre/average skillwise.
Some people are just naturally good at video games, and there's nothing "unfair" about being better than other people.
Some people are bad because they're using less than stellar equipment as well.
Is it unfair that I'm running better hardware than someone, and am therefore able to react to situations faster than they can?