(im not a tree hugger by the way)

They happen too frequently. Id like it if I didnt have 3 going at once. Of course there are the things that help that, but they take like 10 turns each to get rid of. its really having a bad effect on my poor enviroment :c

2 Typos in the code!
"Evironmentalist" in Chemical Spill Situation. Produces an error.
"Pandemic" in CPMDC, where it should say "PandemicOutbreak". Produces another error.
See debug.txt in "My Games"-Folder. I've fixed it for myself, but you should fix it for everyone :)

please add policies to prevent these, like flood walls, WHO funding, ect....

Could you make one that is no Diseases version? Those get me the worst.

Fantastic alternative to the original pack. May I suggest that putting more money into the different task forces included should increase the state employee membership?

Thanks for the info. I still plan to give your mod a try either way, because it sounds like it adds a needed dimension to the game. Really looking forward to it if you can manage to add that other PR stuff. Thanks for the mod!

Also, sorry for getting your name wrong before; I was answering on my phone and I think autocorrect savaged it. Thanks for your thoughts/suggestions.

@Proconsul - To answer your question succinctly, disasters in the mod only cause negative emotions, which can be minimised. I agree that what you set out might be better/more realistic, I'm not sure it's possible in Democracy 3. If I think of a way to do it, I'll add it, but I don't know how I would at the moment.

@Elinor, that seems a little off, at least for a country like USA goes. When a disaster strikes, like a major flood across two or three states, or wildfires, hurricanes, etc. those directly affected tend to be somewhat upset with the government in the short term, sure. But everyone ELSE in the country reacts almost solely on how the government handles it.

In USA, for instance, a well managed response can be a public relations bonanza for a US president, while a bungled one (Hurricane Katrina) can haunt a president for months or even years afterwards with negative public perception.

That is what I was really asking, i.e. if one prepares well beforehand and thus manages to respond effectively and quickly to a disaster, is he going to enjoy the net reward of being seen as a good leader in a crisis? Or are disasters invariably negative when it comes to voter approval, with well managed responses just making them somewhat less negative?

@Proximal - Effectively, yes. Disasters always make people upset, but not handling them well leads to the disasters being worse and lasting longer, making them more upset. Also, there a're things you can do to make some of the worse disasters less likely.

Are there any public relations rewards/penalties linked to how well or badly you handle disasters?

@Reaver - The version of the mod with Terrorism can be found here and is highly recommend :)

upload one with it too