Very nice scenario, - thanks !

Not a bad scenario but can not run a class 321 on third rail?. Thank you.

Well sorryyyyy Mr S-man, I didn't know you weren't allowed to do any trains in a game.

Well, the 321 doesn't and can't run on third rail, even though it can in TS2014. In my opinion, people should not use trains at places where it can't run, that makes it unrealistic, and a simulator are supposed to be realistic, because it is a simulator, and not a fantasy game. In this route you can use Class 319 or 377, but if you don't have it, then don't do the scenario, and instead go on a line with overhead catenary.

@rdp42 Perhaps. I'll see what I can do in my next scenario on the ECMLS / GEML

Enjoyable trip but thought it could have been better populated with ai. Thanks

like

i dont have FCC 377

Should have used 377/5

Well I meant that TS2014-wise

Suggest that you check out the spec for a Class 321 and you will find that it is pantagraph pick up only,not 3rd rail.

Any EMU train works with 3rd Rail AND Pantographs

Ignoring the lack of overhead catenary that the Class 321 requirers to power it's self along.I thought that this was a brave attempt to provide a new source of traction on the "Old 59 Line".Well done.

Not a problem :)

Nice one thanks