Command: Modern Operations

Command: Modern Operations

Korean Campaign, 2018
8 則留言
SuB 2024 年 8 月 29 日 下午 12:11 
@Swag no
lol
Swag 2022 年 12 月 1 日 上午 9:31 
ShadowofChernobyl 2022 年 10 月 25 日 上午 11:20 
This is missing Suwon AB entirely which is pretty disappointing, considering it's a major hub for ROKAF activity.
Courting Carcass 2021 年 11 月 19 日 下午 11:10 
not to be rude, but actually the CSG (5) is in Yokosuka (near Tokyo), and the 3rd is the smallest of the 4 marine divisions, but other than that it seems to be correct (there is usally a csg in westpac besides 5 iirc).
SophionBlack 2021 年 9 月 6 日 下午 3:09 
Having all ground units on an unchangeable weapons hold RoE strips away any and all initiative as well as autonomy. This needs to be changed as well as an increase in stand-off strike options for both aircraft and naval assets. I also note the lack of Iwakuni, Misawa, and Sasebo bases which would absolutely provide secondary and tertiary supports for a major theater war in Korea. Its got a lot of potential but it feels constricted on several fronts.
bwaffle 2021 年 2 月 14 日 下午 9:53 
I concur with the other two posts about adding at the minimum one CSG.
ΗΞΧATαηταlνs 2020 年 1 月 26 日 上午 8:27 
Awesome work, I concur with Courting Carcass, would it be possible to add one or two fully-equipped U.S. Carrier Strike Groups? IRL, one CSG is permanently stationed at Okinawa, Japan along with a division of U.S. Marines, and there is usually a second full U.S. CSG task force sailing near the Korean Peninsula during periods of escalated tensions with North Korea and China.
Courting Carcass 2019 年 12 月 5 日 下午 9:59 
great scenario, would you be willing to add a CSG or 2?