Im so lucky to find this argument.. I can just troll everything you guys are talking about.

*someone gets constructive critisism and suggestions*

What to do?

Answer - Get hated.

Dont answer - Get hated.

Accept critism - Get hated.

Put suggestions into creation - Get hated by other players that dont like it.

Get hated - get hated for abandoning your workshop creation.

Also.. Fallacious arguments?. Fallacious arguments.

"It's painted exactly as it's painted in game, with a dull, uninspiring grey paint and drab yellow details. It's a military standard issue rifle, what do you expect?!"

?! = suprised. not angry. just incase thats what started this.. which im sure is not.

and I also dont read anything offensive here so i'll just... drift off existance.

@Simple farmer of noble heart.

What about that post? "Do you always react to criticism like that?" Where did you get that idea? he made a very normal response that had no offense whatsoever. Now you are stating that your ideas and suggestions are not welcome.. when all he did was answer why your suggestions are not possible.

It's either im not understanding what you're talking about or you are not understanding us.. since im not a native english speaker.

I got defensive? I was giving a reason why i did not consider your suggestion.

It is not a matter of personal offenses or whatever you are thinking. You reacted to my criticism with fallacious arguments, lol. Why don't you undertand that?

You keep saying I got offended by your reply...question is, where did I get offended? You mean in this reply: "Do you always react to criticism like that?"? If that is what you think, you are quite mistaken. That was simply a question to ascertain if your reaction to criticism is always like that, nothing else.

You got defensive when I made the suggestion about painting, just look at your reply (with key parts underlined):
" It's painted exactly as it's painted in game , with a dull, uninspiring grey paint and drab yellow details. It's a military standard issue rifle, what do you expect ?! "

I reacted positively, but you got offended when i didn't take your idea into consideration. Most people don't even give you any reasons.

You completely missed the point...the fact that you did not take my suggestion into consideration matters nothing to this discussion. The deal here is: you are not used to disagreement, and will, again, by your own words, "get really angry" if another opinion comes into conflict with your own. You keep trying to revert my arguments against me when they do not apply to me, since you are the one who reacted negatively to criticism, not me.

And nah, I'm not flaming. I'm being outright rational here. You, on the other hand, are using logical fallacies to invalidate my arguments. Use real arguments, if you really want to discuss.

Or maybe you're just trying to flame?

My point is that you didn't accept the fact that i did read your suggestion and answered why it wasn't taken into consideration.

I guess you are still angry at something...

Now you are making random quotations of my posts here...what is your point, anyway?

"Do you always react to criticism like that?"

Yes...what about that post?

Simple farmer of noble heart 22 hours ago
Dude...it was simply a suggestion, positive/constructive criticism. Do you always react to criticism like that?

And are them? I'm just stating a fact...you disagreed with my suggestion, and that's completely ok, but afterwards, by your own words, "you got really angry". Just look at your replies here.

It's you the one who can't deal with disagreement. I noted your suggestion and justified why i won't apply it, and you just started "oh my suggestions are not welcome here"

It is not about me not being able to read. It is about you not being able to deal with disagreement.

Ok, don't suggest if you can't read, that's a lesson for you.

And when did I call you names here? I simply SUGGESTED your sculpt deserved better painting, which has nothing to do with disagreeing with your opinion about your own model or getting mad at it as you imply there...your comparison is absurd, not to say illogical.

You are getting angry? Well, sorry about that, If I recall correctly, I said I will refrain myself from commenting about your creations from this point on, but if you keep replying, I'll have to defend myself from your fallacies.

... Now i'm getting really angry. I understand that you're talking about details, but as i told you, this is supposed to represent a copy of the in-game model. Now, i know you didn't even do any research before posting, but seriously. The model has no detail like that, as such, this one has no details. I understood what you where meaning and thanked you, but also specified why that particular suggestions was not being taken into consideration. Constructive criticism is not "hey add x, if you don't do it youre an asshole", it's more like "hey, i think that magazine could be shaped to better resemble the actual model by doing x"
Thanks for your attention. And read the whole message next time.

The right question is: when did I say something OP said offended me? I simply meant OP should think a little bit out of the box, and undertand "painting" is not only the color scheme, but also small details such as holes, rivets, and other things you can do by adding gradients to the body of the gun.

Anyway, it is quite clear my suggestions aren't welcome here, so I'll just refrain myself from commenting in the creations of this author from now on.

I don't really know.

@Simple farmer of noble heart..

Im not really sure what offended you... he said nothing really offensive..

The only way that can be offensive if you were reading it in a way that makes it sound offensive.

It was, and i answered why the rifle isn't better textured.

Whatever...like I said, it was simply a suggestion.

Uh, i reacted by answering you? I don't think i used any offensive terms or anything? If that answer offended you in any way, i'm sorry, didn't mean to offend. But yeah, that answer pretty much sums up why the rifle is very dull and lacks colors.

Dude...it was simply a suggestion, positive/constructive criticism. Do you always react to criticism like that?

It's painted exactly as it's painted in game, with a dull, uninspiring grey paint and drab yellow details. It's a military standard issue rifle, what do you expect?!

This nicely sculpted model deserves better painting.

Not everyone does.

it depends on the map, on a map where everything has dark blocks.. of course you will see them.

Uh. I always see them.

It changes alot. I usually not realize that 50 stick men just passed me then knifed me in the back.

"harder"
i hate those guys who use the stick men and guns. It changes nothing, and you look horrible.

With this.. your character will be harder to see in all possible ways.

Its funny how that if you want to be a tryhard. Just remove all the blocks till its just the unremovable blocks. So if you want to be a tryhard. Become a mannequin with mannequin guns..

Also knives and shovels dont have unremovable blocks. So you can make your knife invisible and everyone thinks you're fisting them.

Like the rifle barrel is forced.. to be a barrel.. and that you cannot put 5 blocks going down.. because apperantly its a barrel..

That's true, though some are absurdly nonsensical.

Yes but these restrictions is made for game balance.. like how are you supposed to know that a massive block of ice is a machinegun?

Heh, tell me about that. Restrictions simply break up any of your dreams. I had to squeeze the Liberator a lot to make it. In fact, as you can see, the optic looks really bad.

My brain dies whenever I try to make a gun that is larger than a Ak-47

Thanks :')

Good Job!

You have no idea how hard was it to make this look at least a tiny bit like the one in-game. Fuck restrictions.

It looks so simple. But great.