安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
You're saying that fixed artillery has only defensive capabilities, AND fixed artillery encourages camping. You also say defense and camping are not the same either. Logically speaking, these two sentences you created make no sense. It is pretty much saying: A implies B (B and C cannot be the same). A also implies C.
This pretty much tells me that you did not put too much thought into why there should not be fixed artillery other than ' I dislike "camping" and I think it is camping, therefore; don't do it '. The rules you like to enforce (mainly this one in question) just seem as though you are purposefully taking the fun out of the game because you want it your way. As though the people who support profiling/generalizing are somehow righteous.