Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
You're saying that fixed artillery has only defensive capabilities, AND fixed artillery encourages camping. You also say defense and camping are not the same either. Logically speaking, these two sentences you created make no sense. It is pretty much saying: A implies B (B and C cannot be the same). A also implies C.
This pretty much tells me that you did not put too much thought into why there should not be fixed artillery other than ' I dislike "camping" and I think it is camping, therefore; don't do it '. The rules you like to enforce (mainly this one in question) just seem as though you are purposefully taking the fun out of the game because you want it your way. As though the people who support profiling/generalizing are somehow righteous.