Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem









Or if one can set, how much new inventory places comes available, if one upgrade the strength skill for 1 point. That would be wonderfull. So one could aditionaly set the maximum inventary space, that the agents has, if their strength skill is fully upgraded. 20 would be a good maximum. One could scroll it, it it would take to much space on the screen.
It would also be cool, if I could set, that guards with a level 1 security door card goes through red doors. The coolest would be, if guards uses its cards the same way as the agents. They unlock a red door with the card and than he lock the door again (make it red again). The same with the agents: If they could relock a securety door with a card, it would be great.
And a option to set how many cameras are in the levels would be good. From a few to a lot or so.
I was wondering how exactly the credit scaling modifier works in order to adjust it to my preference. I know that on expert(+) credit settings are as follows:
credit multiplier: 0.75, credit scaling: 25%, credit scaling ceiling: 4
Does that imply the following formulas onto the base credit value? (c is the base credit value)
level1 facility: c*0.75
level2 facility: c*0.75*1.25
level3 facility: c*0.75*1.25*1.25
level4+ facility: c*0.75*1.25*1.25*1.25
Or is it a different formula entirely?