Подпишитесь, чтобы загрузить
StarGate Asgard Ship Mk3 !Outdated see comments for update!

UPDATE 1/4/2020 : An update by space engineers broke this old bluepritnt, please see the comments for updated versions of this ship. I made a new updated more detailed version here:

https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1959704603

AND steam user Devilrock made this:
Devilrock Aug 13, 2018 @ 5:53am
Hi, i have recreate your ship, with help of your screenshots, i create 2 versions, french and english.
Link :
English : https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1477659580
French : https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1477602436




I had to re-name and re-upload all the screenshots but they are up and looking good now! No need to see my screenshots wall here anymore:
http://gtm.steamproxy.vip/profiles/76561197961211669/screenshots/

Steam messed them up originaly even though it said it had my pictures at the correct file size, so it never did get the right resolution up, BUT all the pics are sharper full res now.


Block# = 11,433
Non-Armor blocks = 2062
conveyers = 1083
lights = 218
thrusters = 229
tirangles = 2,334,938
gridmass = 11,283,263
gyros = 92
external turrets = 16
Jump drives = 8
Refineries = 2
Assemblers = 2
Cryo pods = 10 (Asgard ship here:)

FEATURES:

Survival ready (tested). No mods used. "mini" asgard ship (smaller than 1:1 scale for LESS lag). Flys in atmoshere without hydro or ion thrusters. Large hanger. Up to 4 samll ships can be landed on it with no problems (tested). Full air pressure system. Looks more like the show now too.

ABOUT:

Well I started with my old ship, and removed everything but the armor and engines then I erased most of the engines reshaping the wings. I built it back up from there. You'll see most of the hull is still the old ship, but every block inside is new. I got rid of the grav drive, put the reactors and jump drives in the upper pylons, put down facing large atmospheric thrusters everywhere they'd fit, and added a hanger where I was missing a feature of the model from the show. I had to cut weight a lot of times and re-test it, to get it where I wanted in the flying department, but she works like you'd think she should, better even.

TESTING:

She uses half her hydrogen to escape gravity if you go easy on it, and she has 10 hydrogen tanks, so that's a lot of fuel. I did try it in survival to be sure it really worked, it does. But man its expensive to run and you need a miner to resupply every time you enter or exit atmosphere.

Survival capable? Yes. Practical for survival? Not really, but doable. If you want to operate it in survival and you have the support network in palce for fuel you CAN do it, its just a lot of work to keep running. She is a very hungry hippo for urainium too. Oh and she can use a ton of rockets in a hurry as well. The 11 per turret I have in there to start is not even a 4 second burst worth.

Also, in survival you will want to turn off the jump drives if your going to enter the atmosphere right after a jump so you won't overload the reactors, I didn't test that particular thing, but you might not have enough lift when you get below 3000m if your in constant overload. In creative you can just flip on the hydrogen thrusters and not worry, about any kind of lift. With hydrogen on its stops on a dime, for its size. Even in survival it will be useful to use the hydrogen thrust in any envirnment as brakes sometimes.

If you need to stop or go fast, think hydrogen, then remeber you gotta mine it in survival lol.

She still makes lag, even on my brand new beast machine, but she is still better than the 1:1 scale ships, and useable. I drop to 40-60fps with it pasted in down from a solid 110fps without it on a 2g gtx960ti, with an 8core proccessor and 16gb of ram, so ya she's not the most PC freindly ship in my blueprint fleet to be sure, but I hope its still playable for most.

UPDATE:

NASA, the Agard have landed. Yes it lands on flat ground, just got done testing it. Warning: DO NOT leave your Asgard ship parked on the ground and save your game! When you reload, bad bad things will start to happen, LMAO. (very entertaining and scary though, did you know giant space ships are quite good dancers?)

I guess the balance is just right so she is happy to sit on her pylons, it didn't even pop any thrusters when it started dancing after I loaded again. If you set it down slow enough you don't even get many brown smoke puffs.Then turn off the dampners, she settles a little, and then your good to turn off the thrusters completely. Your still like 15-20 stories off the ground, but if you got small ships your good. If you do use this in survival, you could get cargo accsess down there real easy, because the hydrogen thrusters are all piped down there.

My jaw litterally dropped when it sat down on its pylons and the nose didn't fall, I had no idea. What a cool develpoment too. You could pop some landing gear down there, or maglocks, you got a real live mother ship lander!


CONCLUSION:

It is awesome to see it peeking over a mountain JUST LIKE THE SHOW! I tried to recreate some of the screenshots of it from the show that come up on a search for "asgard ship".

I hope you enjoy this, and let me know what you think, what does it need to improve? Where is it the most awesome?

P.S. In my early screen shots I have the "Asgard Ship-X ultra-lag 9000" version made entirely out of interior wall blocks (replaced all the light armor in setools as a test flight model) and it is interesting how much difference it makes going from light armor to interior plate, both in weight loss, AND frame loss, its amazing to be sure. I got into the single digits frames with it, but it lost 2,000,000 off the grid mass too. We need another armor class of ultra light with low polys now that we are in planets. I'll upload it as a gag or for testing if anyone requests it, anyone? lol Oh and one more thing, I took all but 3 of the spotlights down from the early screens of it (ones not shown here but on my wall) they made some lag too, but it looks even better in space or at night with them, you might want to add them back on if your not bothered by a few less frames.