Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Like I said in most of the blurbs about these interchanges: they're based on real-life design speeds, not so much on a direct one-on-one comparison to any particular existing junctions (they're also waaay too symmetrical for that). Even then, the ones with the loops feel pretty tight to me as well :)
@MrFDOTRBLX: yes their sizes are ridiculous, but I'm trying to hold myself to real-life design standards wrt speed, curves, inclination, etc. These are 'realistic' interchanges!
Three-Level Stacked Roundabout
Partially Unrolled Cloverleaf
there you will enjoy building