Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский — Испания)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский — Латинская Америка)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский — Португалия)
Português-Brasil (португальский — Бразилия)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
In the game it is more difficult to build bridges and junctions with your highways and I have to delete the entire length of it to make it pretty.
Standard 1-2 tiles wide (2-tile wide median with 2-tile wide road, 1-tile wide median with 2.5-tileish wide highway road.) medians are good and don't take up much space and can be used with standard interchanges from the game or workshop.
You can draw them like this: http://www.reddit.com/r/CitiesSkylines/comments/33qek6/how_to_build_a_parallel_roads_or_highways/
I prefer maps that don't look to be terraformed already. No neat lines of trees, no plots designated for farming, no man-made canals, no flat field for an airport; just the region in its natural state. As for the highway and railway, it should just pass through the region with no provided off-ramps, as if there are no expectations for a city to be built here.
But I'd play a Timbuktu map that was redesigned in such a manner.