Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
while the germans used the term 'king' in some areas, it doesn't mean the same thing to them. in the migration era, we get germanic kingdoms - but they aren't in germany ( the migrators) - how much central authority those kings had is a seperate discussion, i'm curious how attila will handle that. Later, the Franks under clovis lead to, in time, both France, and the holy roman empire.
HOWEVER - it's not impossible that Arminius ( of Teutonburg forest )or nay of several other kings that were defeated by their own would-be subjects COULD have successfully forged kingdoms -
after all, that's exactly what Caeser was trying to stop, wasn't it?
Anyway, i've taken a bit of a break - this is good encouragement to get back to it!
Great mod.
as to the rest, and the tech treee, I 'll get crackin, sir!
anyway, just getting this in a placeholder for teh first tests, sorry not much is up yet.