Sid Meier’s Civilization VII

Sid Meier’s Civilization VII

Ikke nok vurderinger
Effect Swap: Partisan x Stuka
   
Pris
Føj til foretrukne
Gjort til foretrukken
Fjern som foretrukken
Type: Mod
Filstørrelse:
Offentliggjort:
Opdateret:
6.070 KB
23. aug. kl. 17:28
27. aug. kl. 12:48
2 ændringsbemærkninger ( vis )

Abonner for at downloade
Effect Swap: Partisan x Stuka

Beskrivelse
Moves the ideological Combat Strength bonus from the Partisan to the Stuka. The Partisan unit gets extra Combat Strength per War Support instead.

The Partisan bonus felt odd for a Diplomacy or Influence oriented player who might not even pick an Ideology to remain more friendly with other leaders. Now the Partisan no longer requires an Ideology to be effective but instead shines fighting for civs with high Influence, befitting a unit from a City-State bonus.

The Stuka's unique effect isn't very flavorful, but I found that the original Partisan effect fit it perfectly, so I moved it over.

Partisan
  • +5 Combat Strength compared to regular Infantry units.
  • +1 Combat Strength per War Support.
  • +10 Healing in owned territory.
Stuka
  • +10 Combat Strength against civilizations with different Ideologies.
  • -4 / -2 Movement compared to Trench Fighters / Dive Bombers.
  • -2 Range compared to Trench Fighters / Dive Bombers.

Side note: Currently, the Tier 2 upgrade for the Stuka costs 310 Production more than Dive Bombers for some reason, which doesn't seem right to me. Let me know if I should fix that as part of this mod.

[www.paypal.com][bsky.app]
3 kommentarer
fanofrush 27. aug. kl. 4:56 
Negative diplo means you are a war monger because you take a decrease for each captured setlement but doesn't immediately lead to low relationships with every civ. You can always declare a formal war as a mil focused playthrough to avoid that initial decrease in war support. I would say that paying diplo for war support is like internal propaganda to raise the happiness of your pop. I never noticed a decrease in relationships with other civs based on low war support. And usually resistance groups only form when a war is going very badly. Partisans gaining strength on negative war support would be like the resistance gaining strength while the rest of the country falls apart.
JNR  [ophavsmand] 25. aug. kl. 16:25 
I think we understand war support differently then. For me, fighting against oppressors is reflected in having high war support, because being the target of an invasion gives you war support and so does having good diplomatic standing.

Negative war support means you're a warmonger and everyone hates you.
fanofrush 24. aug. kl. 5:32 
I associate partisans with a resistance movement. Please correct me if those are two separate things. But it would be interesting if the partisan unit gained strength on negative war support to show their increased determination against invaders/oppressors.