Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español – España (spanska – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spanska – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (portugisiska – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisiska – Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Long rivals becoming historical rivals also sounds good, though it shouldn't be flat 50 years. Maybe just make a high mtth for any two mutual rivals to become historical rivals, and then reduce the mtth if they are fighting a war, having a truce, etc?
@God Gamer I was thinking about dynamic historical rivals but I still have to figure out sth not too punishing, thought about sth like being rivals for X years (like ie. 50) to become historical. What do you think? Bc if you can humiliate twice a tag then its fate is already sealed.
@Feraa Hi, interesting idea, I will add this option soon
PDX YOUR FOOLS, HIRE HIM!!!!111