Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i mean, why not criticize them for using guns and reticles? (so original huh)
also, it's more of a cultural trope that multiplayer fps is stale. it's a huge playerbase playing fps the same as ever. however, it might get old for a human to play the same kind of fps videogame for years and decades. im not saying theres no grounds for the idea, but yeah, it comes off to me as a sign that someone may be doing - "i probably complain about so many things in simple, broad, unverified ways"
and again, i dont think you shouldn't complain about things you care about. that's why im commenting, right, im giving feedback to you
An unfinished game in not in Beta. Beta is a finished game undergoing testing for gamebreaking bugs.
An Alpha is an unfinished game.
A beta should be the full release with minus any bug fixes from bugs found as a result of the beta.
The term beta is a well-defined term, and a "beta" with less content than the release is just misusing the term.