"Whelp looks like I am about to be banned for making one post on this forum...

But since I am here posting this let's take a look at why censorship of valid criticism is ineffective:

1. Selective censorship actually reveals weaknesses: When entities whether be they corporate or government censor valid criticism, it often highlights the very issues they're trying to hide. This is demonstrated in the Chinese case, where research shows that **censorship isn't primarily aimed at suppressing government criticism** - because doing so would be counterproductive.

2. Psychological backlash: When people's valid criticisms are censored, it tends to strengthen their resolve and opposition. Research shows that this is particularly true when people feel strongly about their positions - they become more likely to resist and find ways around censorship.

3. Ineffectiveness in modern context: In today's interconnected world, China, despite being ranked **187th out of 197 countries in press freedom**, still cannot effectively suppress all criticism of its government.

The evidence suggests that censoring valid criticism often backfires because it:
- Validates the criticism by showing fear of it
- Creates more interest in the censored content
- Motivates people to find alternative ways to share information
- Damages the credibility of the censoring authority

-- If you need sources contact me here on Steam I will gladly provide this information."