Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
That's why the "strategy fun" in Langrisser M is way way higher. Weaker tactician can clear those stages with brute force of sheer power alone, while better tactician clears those with way way lower power characters, the catch is all the same in TRPG genre, it all boils down to how much you are willing to read. It takes a lot of reading "per stage".
In SoC bonds just give 5% stats, its nothing compare to Langrisser M
Basically SoC copy-cat the core design of Langrisser M and slapped a 2D-HD Octopath theme over it. You will find a lot of commons between the 2 games. But there are still differences, and this guide is here mainly to show what are the difference between the two.