安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
That's why the "strategy fun" in Langrisser M is way way higher. Weaker tactician can clear those stages with brute force of sheer power alone, while better tactician clears those with way way lower power characters, the catch is all the same in TRPG genre, it all boils down to how much you are willing to read. It takes a lot of reading "per stage".
In SoC bonds just give 5% stats, its nothing compare to Langrisser M
Basically SoC copy-cat the core design of Langrisser M and slapped a 2D-HD Octopath theme over it. You will find a lot of commons between the 2 games. But there are still differences, and this guide is here mainly to show what are the difference between the two.