Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's why the "strategy fun" in Langrisser M is way way higher. Weaker tactician can clear those stages with brute force of sheer power alone, while better tactician clears those with way way lower power characters, the catch is all the same in TRPG genre, it all boils down to how much you are willing to read. It takes a lot of reading "per stage".
In SoC bonds just give 5% stats, its nothing compare to Langrisser M
Basically SoC copy-cat the core design of Langrisser M and slapped a 2D-HD Octopath theme over it. You will find a lot of commons between the 2 games. But there are still differences, and this guide is here mainly to show what are the difference between the two.