Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Are you Sabellian and say that only one Person exists, and that God the Holy Spirit and God the Son do not exist seperately? If you think that, why does Jesus sit at the Right Hand of God?
Or, are you Modalist and say that the Persons of God the Holy Spirit and God the Son do exist, but not independently, and are instead modes of God the Father, which act on their own due to His omnipotence and omniscience?
You said the Book of Enoch and the Last Testament of Moses (also quoted) are in the Biblical canon. The Book of Enoch being quoted in Scripture does not make the whole book Divinely Inspired. It makes the quote Divinely Inspired.
https://www.biblehub.com/interlinear/1_samuel/19.htm
In the Hebrew, the literal text is "[Michal, David's wife] saying, if not you [David] do save your life tonight, tomorrow you will be killed" . The description of when Saul sought to kill David states "and to kill him [David] in the morning" .
Furthermore, I ask you this: if someone called you at three o'clock in the morning and asked a favor, would you tell them you'd do it "tomorrow"? A day begins at midnight on the secular calendar: it's already that day, and he wants you to do the favor after the sun rises. That's not actually tomorrow, but we call it that.
Here is Genesis 1:5, which uses "evening and morning", as it was written by Moses: https://www.biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-5.htm . The word for "evening" in Hebrew is "ereb", which means sunset.
The Hebrew text clearly says "and there was evening, and there was morning".
Thus, by the original Biblical script, you are wrong.
If Acts 10 has nothing to do with eating, why did the Disciple Peter receive the vision when he was hungry, and why did was he told to kill and eat ? Obviously, God was not telling Peter to eat unclean animals, as he is a Jew, but he was using it to explain what would become the regulations of Acts 15. (Likewise, it was a sign that the Gentiles were going to be grafted into Israel.) Why was he shown animals a Jew specifically cannot eat, like reptiles and animals with cloven hooves? These are the same dietary restrictions that the Ancient Church deemed acceptable to bind Gentiles.
Genesis 1:5
English Standard Version
5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.
1. God works during the day
2. Evening
3. Morning - the first day (ends)
Morning/sunrise marks the beginning and end of each 24-hour day.
Leviticus 7:15 - eaten the same day, not leave any until morning.
1 Samuel 19:10-11 - tomorrow means the next morning when it's already night.
Genesis 19:33-34 - "yesternight"
Numbers 11:32 - a 24-hour day is comprised of day and night, followed by the next 24-hour day which begins with day.
John 20:19 - the same day at evening. It can't be the same day at evening if evening begins a new day. Morning begins a new day.
Evening to evening is a tradition the Babylonians practiced and was adopted by the Jews during their exile there. The Messiah warned you about the traditions of Judah in Mark 7:6-9.
Acts 10:28
[28]And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; 👉but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.
If you can't understand a metaphor it's because you have a wicked heart of disobedience. When the Messiah says he's going to make his disciples fishers of men, he doesn't mean they are supposed to go eat people. It's the same thing here - a metaphor. You need to stop making excuses and reconcile your twistings of the New Testament with Isaiah 66:15-17 which says God slays eaters of pork in the tribulation. That makes no sense if God abolished his dietary laws.