Total War: PHARAOH DYNASTIES

Total War: PHARAOH DYNASTIES

82 оценки
Better AI Templates
   
Награда
Добавяне към любими
В любими
Премахване от любими
Тагове: mod, campaign
Размер на файла
Публикуван на
Обновен на
384.283 KB
5 авг. 2024 в 6:10
30 окт. 2024 в 17:00
5 бележки за промени ( преглед )

Абониране, за да се свали
Better AI Templates

В 1 колекция от Alex Zhao
Z's mods
25 артикула
Описание
This mod edited how AI's army compositions to make them use more diverse and elite units. As an example, javelins and bows are no longer counted as the same unit type, so AI will keep both types of units instead of filling half of an army with javelins. This mod doesn't add any economic or stats cheat for AI, so if an AI faction's economy or buildings are limited, it still will use low-tier units.

It should be compatible with any mods except ones that do the same thing. Save game compatible.
18 коментара
Schnell_Scheisse 15 септ. 2024 в 4:29 
Okay, thanks, I'll make sure to have this mod selected for my campaigns!
Alex Zhao  [автор] 14 септ. 2024 в 21:31 
yes
Schnell_Scheisse 14 септ. 2024 в 7:18 
Is this mod still relevant for the new update? I guess CA didn't really fix the AI recruitment in the update?
xavi2333 8 авг. 2024 в 6:43 
@Alex Zhao okey I prefer ur mod, any way that I can manually increase the quality of troops the AI chooe to recruit? Some factons like the acheas continue recruiting T1/T2 units in turn 120 The name of the table? TT
Alex Zhao  [автор] 8 авг. 2024 в 6:35 
@xavi2333 I am not sure and I suggest not to use this mod with Radious.
[MT] IIRhagoss 🧉 8 авг. 2024 в 6:33 
You are the ultimate social benefactor... Thank you!! :ACODC_Trireme:
xavi2333 8 авг. 2024 в 6:26 
compatible with radious?
Tater 7 авг. 2024 в 21:04 
I agree with @Schnell_Scheisse. Your mods are great - thank you!
Schnell_Scheisse 7 авг. 2024 в 7:46 
Thanks for the quick answer! Your mods at the moment are a necessity for me. Great work on the Three Kingdoms version too!
Alex Zhao  [автор] 7 авг. 2024 в 7:43 
@Schnell_Scheisse No, since this is not a "bug". It still works for 2.0.1.